NH House Bill 751 (LSR 172)

implementing an alternative school building aid grant formula, establishing size and cost standards for the construction of new school facilities, and permitting high school vocational technical education programs which lease space to be eligible for school building aid grants.

last updated 03/15/03, 4:00PM



03/04/03 - House Education Committee Reports

From House Calendar No. 19, 03/07/03

HB 751-FN-LOCAL, implementing an alternative school building aid grant formula, establishing size and cost standards for the construction of new school facilities, and permitting high school vocational technical education programs which lease space to be eligible for school building aid grants. MAJORITY: OUGHT TO PASS. MINORITY: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE.

Rep. John R. M. Alger for the Majority of Education: This bill provides an alternative method of computing school building aid that benefits less wealthy communities, but leaves the existing building aid program in law. In addition, a lease provision is included with a ten year limit after which renewal requires further approval. In addition, the bill places school room size limitations (square feet per student) above which the state will not pay its cost without preventing school districts from building to their own designs. This size limit and land area limits are similar to those in our surrounding states and were recommended in a recent Legislative Budget Assistance audit of the facilities planning function of the Department of Education. As a result of the size limitations, in spite of the greater state support for less wealthy communities, analysis of projects during recent years shows the bill will be close to revenue neutral. Vote 10-7.

Rep. Claire D. Clarke for the Minority of Education: This bill creates a new and unrealistically low square foot size limitation for new school construction projects in New Hampshire. This limitation would have adversely affected reimbursements to sixty percent of the projects approved during the last three years according to certain testimony. In addition, this law size limit would adversely impact smaller school communities. This adverse and unintended consequence suggests that this policy change needs further study.