NH Homeschoolers,
Last week a handful of
homeschoolers who had been hearing the incorrect information from the DOE and
the governors office regarding the affect of SB268 on
homeschoolers decided to take action. Below is an account of our
meeting with both both entities. Thanks to Jim Parison for providing
this summary. More information regarding steps homeschoolers can take to
possibly change the direction of SB268 will be forthcoming.
Homeschoolers meet with
the NHDOE & Governor’s representatives
The following is a brief
summary of discussions between home educators and representatives from the
NHDOE and Governor’s office.
Time:
Location: Office of
Deputy Commissioner Mary Heath
NH Department of Education
Homeschoolers came together
to meet with representatives from the Governor’s office and the NH Dept of
Education (NHDOE) to discuss issues related to Senate Bill 268 and the
potential impact of the legislation should it become law. Homeschool
attendees were members of three statewide organizations which included
Catholics United for Home Education (CUHE), NH Homeschool Coalition
(NHHC), and Christian Home Educators of NH (CHENH). The meeting was
coordinated by
Christine Mukai – CUHE
Legislative Affairs V.P., NHHC Nashua Area Rep.
Chris Hamilton - NHHC
Coordinator
Jodie Lucci – CHENH, NHHC
member
Diane Lachance – NHHC member
Jim Parison – CHENH
President, NHHC member
Individuals were invited due
to their attendance/representation at the last HEAC meeting where Mary Heath
attempted to resolve issues SB268 raises for homeschoolers. It was made
clear at this meeting that homeschoolers in attendance spoke only for
themselves, regardless of their affiliation with state-wide homeschool
organizations.
Mary Heath, Deputy
Commissioner at the NHDOE hosted the meeting and Christen Bergeron attended
representing the Governor’s office.
Chris Hamilton also presented
Ms. Heath with a letter suggesting language changes that might make SB268 more
homeschool friendly. Ms. Heath was clearly unwilling to discuss changes
in the bill, but she and Ms. Bergeron did seem interested in adding language to
the rules that might assuage home school parents’ concerns. Jim Parison
clearly explained in summary that the rules suggestion was unacceptable; that
our position was the law should be correct, not corrected later by rulemaking. We
also repeated our position that the language “exempting” homeschoolers was
unacceptable.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Parison