Subject:

Urgent SB 268 Update - Hearing Scheduled!

Date:

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:00:13 -0500 (EST)

From:

Michael Donnelly, CheNH Board Member and Secretary <mike@donnellyclan.com>

Reply-To:

mike@donnellyclan.com

 

It WON'T WORK and COSTS TOO MUCH - Please Contact Your Representative! (Especially the Education Committee) AND Attend Hearing (if you can)

 

 

 

This Bill Will Fail (it should) With Your Help!

The Majority Report Says This Bill Should Pass - It Shouldn't!

CheNH e-Lert March 30, 2006 On April 4th, The NH House will hold a hearing at 10:00 AM in Room 207 LOB to hear testimony on this bill. The majority report (that is a majority of the committee) are recommending that this ought to pass.

We are asking you to call your representative (and the Education Committee) to ask them some questions about this Bill AND to attend the hearing if possible:

  1. Won't this bill, if passed, raise my taxes? It's pretty certain that this bill will result in a tax increase to deal with increased student population, enforcement and discipline related issues. The bill also includes a nice carve out for the Manchester and Nashua shool districts to invest in alternative eduation programs. Why do these districts get special funding treatment? And who is going to fund all of these special programs at the local level? Can you say "HIGHER TAXES"?
  2. Won't this change have a negative impact on public school education? This will have a negative impact on public schools by forcing teenagers who don't want to be in school to have to be in school causing significant discipline problems and negatively impacting the education of those kids who do want to be in school. That's not right. AND IT DOESN'T EVEN WORK - See below.
  3. Won't this law be very hard and very invasive to enforce? Now law enforcement will be checking your kids ages and asking why they aren't in school. They have more important things to be doing.
  4. Doesn't this law restrict parent's rights and personal liberty? Children and their parents can make the best decision as to the best educational and vocational choice for their children. Some teenagers are ready to start college at age 16 and some are ready to enter the workforce at age 16. They should not be prevented from making this important choice.This bill will further erode parent's rights to direct their children's education. Because many children do not need nor want to be in school past age 16 this bill will in a sense make schools a jail or a day care. That is not right.
  5. Homeschool Exemption? An amendment was offered to the bill that would "exempt homeschoolers". On its face this would not work. Such a distinction in treatment violates equal protection under the law issues as well as on its face being superfluous. As soon as home school children turned 16 they would be subject to the law and/or be required to provide some kind of state- approved certificate of completion (more attempted regulation of homeschoolers). Supporters tried to insert this amendment to placate homeschoolers because they know we are effective. Don't be fooled. This law, if passed, will affect your kids. Why else would they be amending the definition of the word "child" in the Homeschool Law, to mean age 6-18?

Attend Hearing and Contact the Committee

The Hearing is scheduled for April 4, 2006 at 10:00 AM in Room 207 LOB. Please come if you can.

Contact the Education Committee Members - click below to find out who they are.

The Education Committee

Cornell Study Provides Ample Evidence of Negative Fiscal and Educational Impact

For more information check out this study which details the impact such a law would have on our taxes and our educational system.

ABOUT SB 268

  1. Raising the compulsory attendance age will not reduce the dropout rate. In fact, the two states with the highest high school completion rates, Maryland at 94.5% and North Dakota at 94.7%, compel attendance only to age 16. The state with the lowest completion rate (Oregon: 75.4%) compels attendance to age 18. (Figures are three year averages, 1996 through 1998.)
  2. Twenty-nine states only require attendance to age 16. Older children unwilling to learn can cause classroom disruptions and even violence, making learning harder for their classmates who truly want to learn.
  3. It would restrict parents' freedom to decide if their 16 year old is ready for college or the workforce. (Some 16 year olds who are not academically inclined benefit more from valuable work experience than from being forced to sit in a classroom.)
  4. Another significant impact of expanding the compulsory attendance age would be an inevitable tax increase to pay for more classroom space and teachers to accommodate the additional students compelled to attend public schools. When California raised the age of compulsory attendance, unwilling students were so disruptive that new schools had to be built just to handle them and their behavior problems, all at the expense of the taxpayer.

2002 Cornell Study on CSA Impact

About CheNH

CheNH is a Christian organization formed to serve and support Christian home educators as they follow God's calling to educate their children. Our purposes are: -provide leadership and support to Christian homeschooling families, churches, and associations. -coordinate a state-wide network of homeschooling information and resources. -represent its membership to the State education authorities as provided by New Hampshire law. -keep members informed of state and national legislation that effects homeschooling. -provide representation to regional and national Christian home education organizations.

Website: http://www.chenh.org

CHENH

Michael P. Donnelly, Esq.

Board Member and Secretary

email: mike@donnellyclan.com

phone: 603-304-9525

Quick Links...

·  Contact your Rep!

·  Cornell Study

·  CheNH Website

·  Register online for CheNH Convention

·  Contact the Committee