|
Subject: |
NHHR-POLITICS: Update on AG's SB268 funding question |
|
Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:39:46 -0500 |
|
From: |
Diane Lachance |
|
Reply-To: |
nhhr-politics@mailman.dimentech.com |
|
To: |
<nhhr-politics@mailman.dimentech.com> |
I did a little
further investigation regarding the Attorney General's office decision that SB268
was not an unfunded mandate, or that it was not in violation of the N.H. State
Constitution, Article 28A.
I just finished
speaking with Deputy Attorney General Bud Fitch. The explanation and
decision he gave are based on the AG's office interpretation of the law, as
well as a Supreme Court decision which challenged Article 28A. The
case which challenged Article 28A was the Town of Nelson
Vs. the Department of Transportation.
In Supreme
Court case, the state redirected a state road away from an area where some
residential driveways had previously joined the state road. In essence,
by redirecting the state road, the state was abandoning the stretch of road
where these houses were located. The Town contended that by redirecting
the road, and putting financial responsibility back on the Town
for that stretch of road, the State was violating Article 28A, and
imposing an unfunded mandate upon the Town to
maintain to the abandoned road. The Supreme Court ruling
was that the town had the DUTY to maintain the roads in the Town,
regardless of whether the number of miles changed.
The analogy to SB268
is that every school distrct has the DUTY to educate it's students
regardless of whether the number of students change.
Deputy Attorney
Finch also stated that the way schools are funded by the state, with a
three year lag between numbers reported and dollars received, the state felt
they were paying for the number of students who were in school three years
prior, even if they dropped out by the time the three years came
around. The district has a responsibility to educate them.
This one is a bit fuzzy to me. Perhaps someone who understands state
funding of education can better explain why this is part of their reasoning.
I thought some
people might find this explanation interesting.
Diane Lachance