NH 2006 Legislative Session

Ad Hoc Committee for Special Education State Statutes Review

last updated 6/12/06 at 7:00AM


APRIL 25TH AD HOC MEETING - Suzanne Lavalla's notes

 

 

review committee charge - which is to review statutes and be sure they are in compliance with federal statutes - revised them as needed and any changes will be brought before next legislative session

 

One thing that was noted that needed change was to adminstrators of SpED - make sure they are in compliance with IDEA in that parents can refuse and IEP

 

Discussed changing wording in 186-C:1 (policy and purpose) from providing an education to "ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free and appropriate .... in least restrictive environment

 

 

Comments made the districts need to uphold their obligations and/or responsibilities to this purpose.

 

Discussion revolved around ages - the 3 to 9 age bracket that are classified (diagnosed) with "developmental delays" - round table discussion about that this is important that these children get services also - could be just slight delay in early years, but if denied services, could end up a bigger problem.  Discussion was about adding developmentally delayed to 13 "categories" that are already covered in 186 (under definitions, different diagnosis') - then adding definition of developmental delays in subsection 2

 

Under "approved home programs", one parent (Bob Beville - son in a charter school not homeschooled) wanted homeschoolers listed in that state would have to approve our programs of teaching SN child(ren) - which would also put us under scrutiny of home visits, approved curriculum, etc.  I stated, that was not our intention - Rep. Stiles reiterated stating her understanding of our "participation" in the Committee was to ensure that homeschoolers were getting access to public schools SpEd programs if wanted not to be approved as SpEd teachers and/or "sites"

 

There was some mention about pending legislation (??) about charter schools being considered public schools (more supervision by DOE i believe is reason).

 

Discussion then revolved around that charter schools need to be defined more with statutes - that, if they are going to be an "approved" school, they must offer SpEd - DOE already gives certain funds to certain charters for services (services that public can't provide)