| <<<home page | index to Virtues>>> |
Conferences on the Virtues
By Fr. Bruno Cocuzzi, ocd
Number 35
Legal Justice
Legal Justice
is defined as “the Virtue which inclines an individual to give the civil
community to which he belongs its due” (what he owes it), or, “the Virtue which inclines him to
perform all those acts and deeds which the community has a right to expect from
him for the sake of the common good.”
It is
classified as a special virtue, that is, a virtue in its own right, because it
places the individual in his proper relationship with the community considered
as a separate moral entity, of which he is a member, and it has as its formal
object that special “goodness” (Latin: honestas) which inheres in working
for the common good. The COMMON
GOOD has a nobility about it that makes it a fitting and worthy goal of human
activity, and as such contributes to the perfection of an individual as a human
being. Among such acts are: the making of just laws, the keeping of just
laws, being engaged in civil service, and even paying one’s fair share of
taxes.
The name “legal
justice” is given to this virtue because it is by means of laws (Latin: leges) that the acts of private
individuals are ordained toward the common good. A synonym for legal justice is “general justice”, not because it
is a complex of all the kinds of justice, but because it tends to bring about
the good of all “in general”; and there is no virtue that exists that cannot be
ordained (turned to) the common good, the good of the entire civil community.
As directed to
the good of the community, Legal Justice differs from some other closely
related virtues, such as:
a. Obedience,
which has as its immediate motive or goal the “carrying out of the just command
of a lawful superior.” We do not need a
“law” to create the obligation of each citizen to be submissive to lawfully
constituted authority.
b. Patriotism,
which is “piety” directed toward our native land. (True Piety is directed to our parents and the family unit within
which we were born and raised). It
inclines the citizen to do those things and render those services which express
loyalty, honor and devotion to one’s country as the land of his human origins
and early education. This we “owe” in
virtue of our “relationship” with our native land, and it prescinds from any
special motive of contributing to the common good.
c. Observance,
which inclines the citizen to show honor and reverence to the individual
persons who stand at the head of the particular civil communities of which he
is a member. We “owe” this to them as
“representing” in their persons the various civil societies of which we are
members and subjects, since it is not possible to exhibit honor and reverence
to the real, but “abstract” entity, which is the “community”.
d. Charity
toward other members of the community, which proceeds from motives of love of
neighbor out of love for God. We “owe
it” to other members of the societies to which we belong to “hold them dear”
(caritas means “dearness”) because we are related to them as brothers and
sisters of the human family, which has God as its Father. It is quite possible (though rare) for
citizens who do not believe in God or who have no love for God, to do good to
other members of the community solely from motives of the common good.
The
Subject of Legal Justice…
As pointed out
very briefly in a previous conference, the virtue of Legal Justice resides primarily
in the lawmakers and in the governors of civil society, whose duty it is to be
the “architects” of the common good. It
is their duty “to decree by law” or “to command” as civil superiors, by means
of which they function as the “directors” or “supervisors” of the common good.
Secondarily
therefore, Legal Justice resides in those subject to the Laws (made by the
legislators) and to the “governorship” of those holding “executive
offices”. By adhering faithfully to the
laws and by carrying out the just directives of those in authority, the
subjects succeed in “directly and immediately” creating or bringing about the
common good.
--------
Three
“questions” are customarily dealt with under the heading of Legal Justice. They are:
1) Why
and How the common good must be pursued; 2) the Components of the common good; and 3) the Defense
of the common good.
----------
1. To
say that all members of human society have a duty to work toward the
common good is the same as saying that the virtue of Legal Justice is a
necessity in human society. Our
very human nature is such as to require that we live in society. We are all “born into” social relationships,
without which it would be impossible to attain first, the immediate and
final earthly goals of our lives, namely, (a) a sufficiency of those things
which satisfy the legitimate daily needs for human life, and which, in the
aggregate, bring us (b) temporal happiness. Without a “modicum” of that temporal happiness we would be unable
to direct our thoughts and activities toward the attainment of second,
our eternal happiness, which is attained through the satisfaction of our
needs as children of God by adoption.
In
the temporal sphere, common experience has shown that we have a variety of
merely human needs that are satisfied by a variety of goods and services, and
that there are a variety of individuals who possess or produce those goods or
services. Interestingly, the possessors
or producers of those goods and services themselves need other human beings who
constitute “a market” for the said goods and services. Once we start talking about “markets” we
have to talk about commerce, that is “delivery systems”, and these in turn are
made possible only by the coordinated activities of all the individuals who
constitute the society. Furthermore,
coordination, or simply, “order,” is not possible without rules and regulations
or Laws. Now the Common Good can be
defined as that state of affairs in which all the individuals constituting a
society actually do have all their minimum, legitimate human needs
satisfied. Therefore, it follows that
unless each citizen of a society possesses the virtue of Legal Justice, by
means of which the activities of individual citizens are “ordered” by law to
bring about the delivery of all other members of the society what they need to
achieve the minimum necessary temporal happiness, the Common Good cannot be
attained. Thus, Legal Justice is a
“necessity” in human society.
[In
re-reading the above, the thought occurs to me that society is composed of
“children” as well as adults, and that therefore, wherever I have talked about
“individual” needs, we must also understand “individual family” needs, since
children obviously cannot fend for themselves in civil society, because they
don’t even know, until after their education is complete, what legitimate human
needs are, much less become a part of the delivery system for goods and
services to individual adults and to families. This thought underscores the reasonableness of traditional moral
philosophy in conceptualizing a minor child as being “included in” and being “a
part of” the person of its father, and furthermore, why the entire family was
conceptualized as being identified with the father of the family. It also underscores, in my opinion, the absurdity
of talking about the “right” of a child to govern himself until after
the child’s education is complete, as well as the absurdity of talking about
individual rights without also recognizing individual family rights.]
It
helps us to appreciate what has been said about coordinating efforts to produce
a delivery system by thinking of society not as a mere “homogenous aggregate”
of individuals, but as an “organized multitude” of individuals. An example of the former would be a heap of
sand or of wheat, the grains of which coalesce by merely being juxtaposed. Examples of the latter (the coalescence of
“heterogeneous”, interrelated elements each of which has a specific purpose and
function to perform in concert with all the other constituent elements to
produce or achieve a particular effect) would be a clock, a tree, or a human
body. The end or purpose of the
organized multitude we call society is that the constituent elements “conspire”
(act together), each in its specific and complementary mode or manner, to bring
about the Common Good.
St.
Thomas tells us, however, that society is not exactly like a clock or a human
body:
“The
totality we call the civil multitude has only the unity of order so
that it is not a simple unity. Therefore,
any individual component of the civil multitude may operate in a way that
is not an operation of the whole, as soldiers in an army may have a duty that
is not the duty of the entire army considered as a whole (military police).
Conversely, the entire army as a whole has a duty that is not the duty
of some individual “soldiers” (non-combatants), since the duty of the army
is to wage war… Thus, those living in society at times engage
in activity which is directed to their own personal good or to the personal
good of others, and at times they engage in other activity which is directed
immediately to the good of the entire society…”
What has been
said above about the attainment of temporal happiness can also be applied
in a general way to the attainment of eternal happiness by those who, as children
of God by adoption, that is, by the Sanctifying grace conferred in Baptism,
are members of the Church. The members
have basic spiritual needs of different kinds, and various “sources” of the
various “things” which satisfy those spiritual needs.
There is a “delivery system” which engages the coordinated efforts
of distinct individuals fulfilling distinct roles within the society which
is the Church (Kingdom of God). We
know, too, that the Church is also a body, analogous to the “organic whole”
spoken of above. There is a Common
Good as well, namely, that all those spiritual needs be adequately satisfied
for each and every member of the Church.
However, we
cannot talk about a “Legal Justice” when speaking about the Church. We have to talk about Piety instead (and we
will do so in due time). The term legal
justice does not apply because we are all members of the same family; we are all brothers and sisters sharing the
same life given to us by identical Parents, to wit, Jesus our Father and the
Church our Mother. Neither is it
possible within the body of Christ which is the Church to pursue “purely
individual” ends. Efforts of an
individual directed to the attainment of his own greater spiritual good, by
their very nature, contribute to the good of the entire Church. And efforts directed to the greater
spiritual good of the entire Church, by their very nature, contribute to the
greater spiritual good of the individual so acting. (Provided, of course, that one’s deeds are “informed” by
Charity. Without Love (Charity), no
matter how “holy” or “heroic” an action may seem, it is utterly without
spiritual value).
It is also
necessary to point out that, beginning in the days of the early Christian
martyrs under Rome, obedience to the laws of the Kingdom of God, may necessitate
disobedience to a law of the temporal realm.
Though such cases are rare, there should never be a doubt in the mind of
the true Christian that he must obey the Divine Law rather than the human law,
even at the cost of his life. Besides,
we have it on the authority of Jesus Himself that the best way for a Christian
to bring about the common good of temporal society is to strive to lead a holy
life: “Seek ye first the kingdom of
Heaven, and all other [necessary or essential] things will be given you
besides.” (Lk. 12:31). And we remember that the Lord God promised
Abraham that, if He could find ten “just” men in Sodom and Gomorrah, for their
sakes He would not destroy the cities.
In speaking
about the basic human needs of individual citizens of the temporal realm,
however, we must remember that the most important and noble among them are not
of a physical or corporal nature, but they are the needs of the higher
faculties of our common humanity. These
are, of course, our intellect, memory, imagination and will. We tend to lump all these faculties under
the expression “mind and heart”.
Therefore every human being has the basic need to know truth, to
experience love, to have good and pleasant memories of past experiences, and to
use his imagination and his will in the exercise of creative and loving
activities. The latter two may be
described as the “need to work” and the “need to love in return”. In other words, our human temporal happiness
is achieved principally in the exercise of the moral virtues, because that is
what constitutes our “perfection” as human beings (as has been demonstrated at
length in some of our earliest conferences in this series). When the legitimate human needs of all
citizens to be “truly human” are satisfied, then each individual experiences
“happiness”, and society has attained its proper goal, the common good of
PEACE, that is, the “tranquility of order”.
From this it should be clear that happiness is a “fringe effect” which
cannot be attained directly. It is a
“by-product” of a good moral life (human perfection).
As already
stated, it is impossible for a human individual to turn his attention to the
higher needs of his nature until his basic physical needs of food, clothing,
housing and employment are taken care of.
Thus, in those nations where a significant number of citizens are
lacking these basic human necessities, the governments thereof have a serious
obligations to try to remedy the injustice (want of legal justice on the part
of the greater majority). Where the
governments themselves are the cause of these injustices, peaceful ways of
replacing them are to be sought by the citizenry of those nations.
| <<<home page | index to Virtues>>> |
* * * * * * * * * * *
MISSION STATEMENT: This web site was created for the purpose of completing the work of Fr. Bruno Cocuzzi, O.C.D These conferences may be reproduced for private use only. Publication of this material is forbidden without permission of the Father Provincial for the Discalced Carmelites, Holy Hill, 1525 Carmel Rd., Hubertus, WI 53033-9770.