|
Part Two The Third Generation and Beyond: The Late 18th to the Mid-19th Century
(Revised edition 1.2, July 13, 2003)
|
|||||||||
|
A
t the outset of the Revolutionary War at least seven young persons
with the surname Chamberlayne, descended from William and Elizabeth,
were about to chart their life paths in the privileged world of East
Virginia's landed gentry. There may have been more than seven.
There remain a number of places where the information available to us is
less than sufficient, notably any children of Edward and Rebecca, other
than the son and the daughter thus far tenuously assigned to them, and
whether there were any children of Richard and Mary who might have
escaped the notice of genealogists to date. Outside the scope of
this inquiry there were also the children of Christopher and Elizabeth
Chamberlayne Hudson, of whom we know nothing and whose account is not
here pursued.
Another, somewhat less likely, possibility regarding the origin of this Ann Kidley Chamberlayne arises from an item in the St. Peter's Parish registry for the year 1756, in which reference is made to the birth of "Kiddy Chamberlayne, bastard daughter of Elizabeth Austin," October 24, 1756. 2 It seems safe to assume that the name "Kiddy" bore some relationship to Kidley (and may have been just a misspelling), and that one or another of the young Chamberlayne brothers was involved. Further, it is not difficult to believe that she might have been brought up respectably as Ann Kidley Chamberlayne, whether at her birth place, Poplar Grove, or elsewhere. If this were the case, then only the year of birth in the existing account would have been in error (and that source included no substantial documentation of that date). In either case, Ann was a Chamberlayne; only the exact identity of her parents is in question. Most likely she was named for her aunt, her father's sister, who, about the time of the young Ann's birth, was in her teens and soon would marry Burwell Bassett, give birth to a daughter, and lose both her baby's life and her own. The name might also have been inspired by her father's grandmother in England whom he almost surely never saw. |
|||||||||
|
Only a few basic facts of Ann's life are known but they are enough to establish linkage to other New Kent families of the 18th and 19th centuries. She married William Cooke, a veteran of the Revolutionary War, probably soon after it ended, which would put her in or approaching her thirties at her marriage. 3 William Cooke grew up in Gloucester County and, along with his two brothers, served in the Virginia Navy in the revolution. After the war he purchased land in New Kent, 99 acres carved out of the Littlepage estate at Cumberland, a tract described by Harris as "... on the right of the road which leads into Cumberland from New Kent Courthouse." 4 (See map, Figure 4.) The Cooke estate came to be known as "North Green." A photo of the house before it fell to ruin in the 20th century is available in Harris, p. 249. | ||||||||
|
The Cookes had two children before William's untimely passing in 1790 or 1791. His death left Ann a widow with two children under three, destined to spend some 47 or 48 years as a widow before her passing in 1838, after having spent only half a dozen years or so as a married woman. Ann's son, William Cooke, Jr. was born in 1788, grew up at North Green, and married, in 1812, Rebecca Hayes, daughter of Robert Hayes, a merchant of Cumberland. They had at least three children, two of whom were given names which resonate with the Chamberlayne legacy: Richard Pye Cooke (1813-1890), and William Chamberlayne Cooke (1815-1885). The third son was given a name which would later appear in the Chamberlayne family as well: James Hartwell Cooke (1820-1870). The family resided at North Green, the children's grandmother Ann still with them. Rebecca Hayes Cooke died in 1821, leaving at least three young children without their mother, and her husband, William, Jr., died five years later, 1826, the year the three boys turned thirteen, eleven, and six. The boys then remained with their grandmother Ann, according to New Kent historian Nellie Barham, and also in the household was their grandmother's daughter, their aunt, whose name was also Ann Kidley Cooke. This younger Ann turned eighteen in 1826. Richard Pye Cooke, the first son of William and Rebecca Cooke, was educated at William and Mary College, rose to the rank of Colonel in the 53rd Militia Regiment, and was a farmer. In 1840 he purchased "Chestnut Grove," the estate a short distance east of North Green, formerly the residence of the Dandridge family and the birthplace of Martha Dandridge Custis Washington. (See "Chestnut Grove" on the map in Figure 4.) Second son William Chamberlayne Cooke lived at North Green and married twice, his first wife dying young, and his wives bearing ten children between them, five of whom lived to maturity. William served in the same militia regiment as did his brother and rose to the rank of Major, and late in life he resided with his brother at Chestnut Grove where he died in 1885. Last- born son James Hartwell Cooke, who was a year old when his mother died and only six when his father succumbed, leaving him an orphan, also was in the military and served in the Army of the Confederacy.
The daughter of William and Ann Kidley Chamberlayne Cooke, also named Ann Kidley Cooke, was born in 1789 or 1790. She grew up at North Green and when she was in her teens, about 1806 or 1807, married Daniel Binns (1767-1814) of New Kent, who was some 22 years older than she. They had a daughter, Ann Kidley Cooke Binns, born in 1808, and Ann the mother died in childbirth or shortly thereafter. 5 The daughter, the third in a line of females given the name Ann Kidley, having lost her mother at birth, now lost her father, Daniel, when she was only six, in 1814. She then grew up in the home of Daniel's second wife, Martha Harman Binns, and two children of that marriage, Ann's half-brother and half-sister. In December, 1836, at 28 years of age, Ann Kidley Cooke Binns married Isaac Otey, a widower of 49 with two daughters, ages ten and seven, but this marriage was not to last. "There was a great deal of friction," according to Nellie Barham, "between his two daughters and his second wife, which precipitated the separation of Isaac Otey and Ann Kidley Cooke (Binns)...." 6 Before the separation, the couple had two children, a daughter, Charles Anna Otey (1837-1901), and a son, John Otway Otey (1839-1916). Harris provides another perspective on the dissolution of the Otey-Binns marriage. From records of the Emmaus Baptist Church, he quotes the record of a meeting held in July, 1840: 7 |
|||||||||
| "... The Committee on the case on Bro. Otey rendered report. Upon investigation of and deliberation on Bro. Otey's case and upon his acknowledgement of error in having striked his wife with a switch with a confession of sorrow for the same The Church determined to retain him in fellowship." | |||||||||
|
Regardless of the extent to which Bro. Otey's errant actions might
have had any bearing on the separation, Mrs. Otey was, according to
Harris, given a nice home with Charles Binns and his family. From the
name Binns one can see a family connection in this arrangement, but one
would be unlikely to guess how it came about. Charles' first wife,
who had died within a year of the marriage, had been Martha E. Binns
(perhaps a cousin), the daughter of the second wife of Anne's father,
Daniel Binns, and therefore her half-sister.
8
Thus, Ann Kidley Cooke (Binns) Otey, from about her 33rd year, not
married, not a widow, and not eligible for remarriage, brought up her
two children in the home of her "half-brother-in-law" and his second
wife and their children.
Upon the four descendants of William and Elizabeth who had carried the name of their English grandmother, the first Anne Kidley Chamberlayne, of Herefordshire, England, a great deal of hard luck had fallen thus far. The first of them in Virginia, Anne Kidley Chamberlayne Bassett, died at age nineteen in childbirth. The second, perhaps the daughter of Edward and Rebecca, lived a long life but lost her husband after only a few years, her daughter in (or following) childbirth in her teens, and her son some twelve years before her own passing. The third Ann, as noted, died in her teens upon the birth of her child, and the fourth had a short, troubled, marriage and spent most of her adult years "legally separated," in lieu of a divorce. |
|||||||||
|
Three children are known to have been born to Richard and Mary, although there might have been more, and of the three, outlines are known of the lives of two, but the third remains unknown and may have died young.
Anne Kidley Chamberlayne. At the White House plantation adjacent to Poplar Grove, the non-resident proprietor, General George Washington, in the early 1770s, hired a young man named John Price Posey to act as steward of the very substantial operation. 9 John was a son of Captain John Posey, of Faifax County, who earlier had been forced by indebtedness to sell his land in Fairfax, and the buyer had been his neighbor, George Washington, who had incorporated the Posey land into his expanding estate, Mount Vernon. It is generally presumed that young Posey was hired in part, and possibly chiefly, because of his friendship with Martha Washington's son John Parke Custis ("Jacky"). Anne Kidley Chamberlayne, who logically appeared to Posey as the "girl next door," was at this time in her teens. By some time prior to 1782, the two had become Mr. and Mrs. John Price Posey. In the tradition of the dowry of the female, a substantial piece of the Poplar Grove land, totaling some 471 acres, was transferred to the couple in the name of Mr. Posey. 10 No evidence has been found of any children born to Anne, but, as will be seen, the marriage did not last long. Posey achieved some success in the New Kent community, serving as a magistrate and being elected at least once to the General Assembly. After the death of Jacky Custis in November 1781, Posey remained on the job as steward of White House for a few years, but erratic behavior on his part eventually led to his being removed from his position by the man in charge, Jacky's step-father, General Washington. The general has been quoted as referring to him as "... that Superlative Villin, Posey." 11 At least as early as 1783 Posey was apprehended several times for a series of misdemeanors, including theft from Jacky's son George Washington Parke Custis, for which the fines levied are said to have ranged from 5 to 200 pounds. Finally, in the summer of 1787, Posey went over the line. In some unknown context, he assaulted New Kent Sheriff Robert B. Armistead, who locked him up in the county jail. Posey managed to escape from the jail, and three days later, on July 15, in concert with a Thomas Green and a young slave named Sawney, whose master was William Chamberlayne of Poplar Grove (son of Richard and Mary), he set fire to the jail and the attached clerk's office where all county records were stored. The result was a total loss of the building and its contents. Virtually all New Kent County records prior to 1787 vanished that evening, leaving generations of genealogical researchers distraught. Posey, Green, and Sawney were promptly captured. On August 15, after being watched carefully for a month out of concern for a possible attempt to escape, Posey was brought before the County Court for a hearing. The presiding justice was Col. William Hartwell Macon, a notable figure in the community, and one who would surface again at a later point in the story of the Chamberlayne family. The justices found sufficient evidence to commit Posey to trial and the prisoner was sent to the "Great Jail" in Richmond to await trial. On October 1, 1787, Posey's trial resulted in his conviction. On appeal, the verdict was upheld, with nine of ten justices finding for the prosecution. From an account of the episode in the records of St. Peter's Parish church: 12 |
|||||||||
| ... Judge Lyons, after a most learned speech, which drew tears from near all present, ask'd the dreadful question (To wit) if he could shew cause why sentence of death should not pass upon him, which so shocked the prisoner, that for some time the organs of speech had left him till at length he spoke to this effect, that he was guilty of the charge and pray'd mercy. Jan'y 18th 1788 was then appointed for the execution. The time arriving he pray'd a week which was granted, and on Jan'y 25 he was executed at the Gallows in Richmond and buried in this county. | |||||||||
|
Sawney, too, in a separate procedure was found guilty and sentenced to
hang, but an appeal on the part of the local citizens to the Governor
resulted in his release and return to Mr. Chamberlayne. Nothing is
known of the fate of the other conspirator, Thomas Green.
Needless to say, another Anne Kidley had run into some bad luck, although not nearly so much as had her husband. Now the widowed Mrs. Posey faced the loss of her land because the law at the time specified that in such a circumstance the property would be forfeited to the state, rather than transferred to the wife or other family of the offender. Officials of the county then petitioned the General Assembly to restore rights to the property to the aggrieved widow. The legislature acted favorably on the petition, saying in the preamble to the Act "... that the property had come to Posey through his marriage and the family had suffered much and the land should be restored to its rightful owner." 13 Whether the "rightful owner" was Mrs. Posey or her brother William is not clear. Some years later, according to Harris, Anne Kidley Posey married
again. Her second husband was William Overton Winston of the long
established Winston family of Hanover County. One son, William
Chamberlayne Winston, was born to the couple in 1803, and Anne resided
there until her death on July 4, 1812. Her son William married
Sarah S. Pollard about 1825, and both died in 1880. Their only
known children are four who all died young.
14
|
|||||||||
|
William married Margaret Wilkinson, known as "Peggy," in July, 1784, in Henrico County. Peggy was born in 1759, a daughter of Nathaniel and Elizabeth Willson Wilkinson of Amelia County, later of Henrico. Nathaniel was a son of George and Margaret Wilkinson of New Kent, whose daughter Mary, Nathaniel's sister, was William's mother. 18 Thus, William and Peggy were first cousins. Whether this fact had any bearing on their not having any children is unknown, and it is not clear that the present-day taboo on the marriage of first cousins would have been in force at that time. Two letters written by General Chamberlayne to his wife during the War of 1812, in the possession of the Virginia Historical Society, have been published in the William and Mary Quarterly Magazine 19 One of them, written in October 1814, when he was at Bottom's Bridge, a few miles east of Richmond on the Chickahominy River, contains some interesting passages which suggest an aura of mystery and stimulate the desire to know more about this couple. Peggy was in Richmond at the time, rather than New Kent, apparently staying with relatives, likely the family of the General's younger cousin (once removed), Captain William Byrd Chamberlayne, who was also at Bottom's Bridge at the time, serving under the Brigadier General. 20 |
|||||||||
| I arrived here last evening and was met with much cordiality, by the officers & men, which was pleasing to me. I have this moment recd. orders to take command of the troops lately under General Pegram.... I think Edwards Health, wd. be restored by staying here, & I shall keep him with me unless his father differs with me in opinion, the water here is a treat especially compared to Petersburg. | |||||||||
| The identity of the Edward whose health apparently was at issue and who was staying with the General is unclear, and there is no direct indication that this Edward was a Chamberlayne, although it seems likely that he was. The next, and concluding, paragraph of the letter supplied another element of mystery: | |||||||||
|
The papers, respecting your land, is in the hands of Wm. Mosby, & if
you freely, & voluntarily, think proper to acknowledge them you will
have a convenient opportunity to do so, before you leave Richmond, but
do not understand me as urging... [torn]... unless free ... [torn] ...
wants it. Its certainly not my chief object in accepting it. My object
is to silence disagreeable contests in certain events but above all to
prove to the World, that you prefer me to all others, & its what I
have done & will always do towards you, & in addition from the Health
of the place this year, I think it wd. be advisable to have the Houses
etc. put in order and judge by yourself, if you would like to improve
a place Where your right was uncertain.
I am sincerely Yrs. Wm. Chamberlayne
PS. Kiss the children for me, & remember me to the old folks. W.C. |
|||||||||
|
Apparently a decision was to be made as to how Peggy would dispose of
a valuable parcel of land, and William seems to have been concerned
about some aspect of his standing with respect to her, or with the
way others viewed their relationship, as was suggested in the
statement "... to prove to the World that you prefer me to all
others...." Regarding the post script, a good guess would be that
the children mentioned were those of the Willam Byrd Chamberlaynes,
who, as will be seen, had at least two young children at the time.
The likelihood of a connection with the family of Captain William Byrd
Chamberlayne gains support from the reference to the land papers being
"in the hands of Wm. Mosby," since the Captain's wife was the former
Ann Williamson Mosby.
In addition to his military career, William Chamberlayne was also deeply involved in political affairs. He served a total of thirty years in the General Assembly, part of the time in the House of Delegates and the remainder in the Senate. 21 William was known, as Harris describes him, as "... a genial country squire who enjoyed hunting, racing [horses] and he even engaged in the pastime of cock fighting, which had become a vogue in his day." 22 Butler adds that the General was a horse breeder as well as racing enthusiast, and in both Butler and the 1928 note in the Virginia Historical Magazine there is a description of the man that calls for repetition: |
|||||||||
| "From the old newspapers it is shown that he was a fine speciment [sic] of the sporting gentleman of the old school; he was a constant patron of the turf, running his own horses, and in one advertisement he appears as a principal in a great main of cocks, in which New Kent opposed another county." | |||||||||
|
Thus emerges an extraordinary image of the gentry of "Old Virginia"
staging cockfights on a county rivalry basis. And what a great find
would be a copy of that advertisement!
Another facet of the life of Gen. William Chamberlayne of New Kent concerns his various real estate holdings and transactions. In addition to Poplar Grove, which presumably had been restored to its original size after the Posey debacle, William also acquired and sold at various times lands along or near the river, including acreage across the river from Poplar Grove known as the Claiborne Hall tract. Harris is the primary, possibly the only, secondary source for land holdings in the area, and the reader not intimately familiar with the New Kent and King William areas will be hard-pressed to fit the few, and often vaguely described, pieces of the puzzle together. An example of the general's transactions, one with a better geographic description than some, is as follows from Harris: 23 |
|||||||||
| On the 23rd of November, 1811, William Chamberlayne and Margaret, his wife, of New Kent County, and Montague Williams and Martha, his wife, of King William County, conveyed to William Gregory the water grist mill owned by Chamberlayne and Williams. This mill was situated on Necatawance Creek below Harrison's Bridge. They also conveyed the high land, mill house and all the low land. | |||||||||
| Suggestions of both William's business and his avocational interests are found in an account book for the period 1786-1810, in the possession of the Virginia Historical Museum. From a description in the guide to the collection prepared by the Virginia Historical Society: 24 | |||||||||
| This section consists of one item, an account book, 1786-1810, of William Chamberlayne. The volume was probably kept at Poplar Grove, New Kent County, Virginia. Accounts concern, principally, the sale of dry goods and products presumably milled at Obediah's Mill, owned by Chamberlayne. The volume also includes entries for production and sale of liquor, dates and amounts of crops planted, records of horse breeding, recipes for dying cloth, and accounts concerning various estates, cockfighting, and gambling. | |||||||||
| Another entry in the same collection provides a possible clue regarding William's brother, of whom we have virtually no knowledge, but it should be noted that the Edward Pye Chamberlayne to whom reference is made here could have been another member of the family who was then residing on the other bank of the Pamunkey not far from Poplar Grove, William's first cousin, a son of Thomas and Wilhelmina. | |||||||||
| Section 14, Bassett, John (1765-1826), Bills of Lading, 1799-1826 This section consists of twelve items, bills of lading, 1799-1826, issued to John Bassett of Hanover County, Virginia. Bills of lading are for the shipment of corn and wheat by John Dungery for Edward Pye Chamberlayne (of the ship William & Edward and bears U.S. Internal Revenue tax stamp).... | |||||||||
|
Thus, a ship plying the trading waters of Tidewater, Virginia in the
early 19th century bore the name "William & Edward," named we presume
for William of New Kent and either his brother or his first cousin.
The census of 1810 for New Kent County listed William with a female over 45 (Peggy), as well as eleven other whites and 78 slaves, the "free whites" including one female 26-45; one male and two females 16-25; three males and one female 10-15; and two males and one female under five. A guess as to the identity of these people would be one or more caretakers and their families, since William may well have been too busy with his military, political, and assorted other interests, particularly his horses, to manage Poplar Grove without such assistance. The absence of a male over 25, however, may weaken this idea somewhat, and also reduces the likelihood that it might have been William's younger brother Edward Pye, who would have been 42 at the time, unless Edward had died and these were the surviving members of his family. Speculation aside, nothing is known about these eleven extra members of the household. The 1820 census showed only a single male in the over-45 category, William, and one female, in the 26-45 bracket. As was previously noted, Peggy Wilkinson was born in 1759, so she would have turned 61 that year, so either the female in the home was not Peggy or a mistake was made in the census. Peggy is believed to have died in 1831, on the basis of a letter in the Virginia Historical Society collection dated that year, described in the guide as "possibly of Elizabeth (Wilkinson) Gregory [her sister]... to Elizabeth H. Barrett (of King William County, Virginia) concerning the death of Margaret (Wilkinson) Chamberlayne...." 25 Presumably such a letter would have followed closely upon the sister's death. Stanard claims William married a second time but identifies the second wife only as "Miss Massie," and provides no documentation. It is clear, however, that he did not get this information from the family papers of William Byrd Chamberlayne, since the note in the Virginia Historical Magazine said William "... was unmarried." Stanard also claims, again with no documentation (available to us, at least) that William had a son "... who died before his father." Gen. William Chamberlayne died September 2, 1836, at the age of 72, his passing noted in the Richmond newspapers and in the Washington-based National Intelligencer. 26 If he did marry a "Miss Massie," and if, in accordance with the standards and practices of the time, he remained married to Peggy until her death, then his second marriage must have come when he was in his sixties, apparently produced no offspring, and failed to catch much notice. The idea probably should be taken as a remote possibility in need of substantiation before it can be taken seriously. Nevertheless, there are elements to the story of William and Margaret which evoke a sense of mystery and of facts and circumstances waiting to be discovered. William's long and full life was notable for his major accomplishments in the military, public service, and business, and for his dedication to the sporting pleasures of a "genial country squire," as well as for an element of romantic mystery. He was the last of his line and the last Chamberlayne of Poplar Grove. |
|||||||||
|
Of the four sons of Thomas and Wilhelmina, the order of listing, implying but not specifically asserting the birth order, is usually William, Byrd, Thomas, and Edward. Dates of birth, however, are absent in most cases and notoriously inconsistent where they do exist. Byrd's date of birth has been shown as 1753 or 1754, although with scant documentation, and that of Edward Pye has been set most commonly at 1758 but also at various other dates in the 1750s. 27 For reasons to be shown, Edward's year of birth is presumed here to have been (about) 1758, placing him about four or five years younger than Byrd. If Edward was in fact born in 1758, as was stated in the family pedigree papers of one of his sons, then he most likely was the youngest of the four because of his mother's age, since that was the year she (Wilhelmina) turned forty-three. This would leave Thomas third in the order, probably born between 1755 and 1757.
Subtracting the 512-acre Claiborne tract leaves some 350 acres, presumably part of the Eglington estate, together with the 512 acres charged to Thomas Chamberlayne. Since Byrd and Edward, who were away from home at the time, were not listed, it may have been that William and Thomas were listed as proprietors of separate parts of the estate. It is also possible that the Thomas listed in the tax record was the elder Thomas, father of the sons, since he would have turned only 55 years of age that year, and no firm evidence has yet been found regarding the time of his passing. The matter remains open for further inquiry. Ownership of the Claiborne Hall tract meant that two Chamberlayne-owned properties separated by the river were linked by William's Ferry. It is not clear whether there was a residence on the tract or, if so, whether any Chamberlayne ever resided there. It is also possible, although this is purely conjectural, that this land had been the home of Richard's brother Edward Pye and his wife Rebecca. By some time in the 1820s, if not earlier, the Claiborne Hall tract had come into the possession of a William Armistead. When Mr. Armistead died in 1829, the plantation was put up for sale by his nephew, also named William Armistead, who served as administrator. 30 (The older William Armistead was the brother of Robert B. Armistead, the sheriff of New Kent assaulted by John Price Posey in 1787, with disastrous consequences.) Thomas Byrd Chamberlayne married Elizabeth (surname unknown), and the couple survived at least until 1803, as is evident in a deed conveyance, dated June 25, 1803, in which they transferred ownership of a 25-acre tract which had been left to him in the last will and testment of his father, Thomas. 31 Nothing more is known of Thomas and Elizabeth that can be documented, including whether or not they had any children. However, the U.S. census of 1820 for King William County listed a Thomas B. Chamberlayne as head of a household consisting of eleven "free whites," including seven persons under eighteen, one male and one female between 26 and 45, and one female over 45. This family almost surely was too young to have been that of Thomas Byrd, son of Thomas and Wilhelmina, who would have been about 65 at the time, but it certainly could have been a son of that Thomas. While there is insufficient evidence to assert that the Thomas of the 1820 census was in fact a son of Thomas and Elizabeth, it seems highly probable that he was because of the coincidence of names, especially in a lightly populated county. There is also the possibility that this Thomas was a grandson of either Edward and Rebecca or Richard and Mary, by way of a son of one or the other couple not known to us.
On November 21, 1776, Byrd was assigned to the Brig Mosquito
with the rank of Lieutenant, and on the same day, Edward, then
(presumably) about eighteen, was received on the same vessel as a
midshipman (p.35), believed to have been a trainee position held prior
to promotion to officer rank. Edward's being a midshipman when
Byrd was a lieutenant supports, although it certainly does not fully
validate, the assumption that he was the younger of the two. Some
time prior to his service on the Mosquito, while in command of a
The Mosquito sailed on February 6, 1777 on a journey in which it experienced both good fortune and bad, its mission to help prevent the British from blocking shipping lanes which were vital to the colonies in trade with other nations, as well as to seize enemy vessels where possible. 33 Early in the mission it captured a British transport ship with a cargo of food and assorted essentials, but, in early June, was itself captured by a British man-of-war much larger than itself, the Ariadne. Byrd, along with the other officers, was imprisoned at Fortune jail on England's southern coast, and escaped, by bribing a jailor, and returned to Virginia and the navy by June, 1778. Pertaining to the cash payment, Byrd subsequently "... presented to the Virginia House of Delegates a petition praying payment of a debt of 1650 guineas contracted through his imprisonment and his subsequent escape...." (p.41). On September 10, 1779, Byrd was assigned command of the Brig Jefferson (p.164). Brig description source Stewart said nothing about Edward being captured, but Claghorn
claimed Edward "... was captured by the British, along with his
brothers."
34
Although Claghorn did not mention any escape by Edward, it seems safe
to presume that if he was captured then he also escaped from Fortune
jail with Byrd and others since he was promoted to 2nd lieutenant in
1777 and continued to hold that rank in 1778 (p.165), which places him
back in active service in the Virginia Navy. In 1781, Edward took
part in the taking of "...two of the enemy's vessels off the coast of
S.C. and went with one of them as supercargo into some part of N.C."
(p.165).
Documenting his service to the end of the war, or at least close to it,
is the fact that Edward was seen with other officers at Frazer's Ferry
after the siege of Yorktown in 1781 (p.165).
It is evident that both Byrd and Edward served long and admirably in the war for independence. Having shared a disposition to the navy as their preferred mode of wartime service, the two brothers apparently also shared a disposition to daughters of the same family. Some time after their return from service, Byrd married Elizabeth Dandridge, daughter of William and Agnes Dandridge of "Huntington," King William County, and Edward married her sister Agnes. Marriage dates are unknown but most likely, for reasons drawn from scant information concerning the birth dates of their children, were in the range of about 1783 for Edward and Agnes and a bit later for Byrd and Elizabeth. The Chamberlayne brothers were also second cousins of the Dandridge sisters, whose maternal grandmother was Susanna Littlepage, younger sister of Elizabeth Littlepage Chamberlayne. 35 |
|||||||||
|
Dates of death are clear for Byrd and one of his sons, thought to be the oldest, who was given the name Otway Byrd, reflecting once again the family ties to the Byrds. On December 12, 1800, the boy, then probably nine to twelve at most, was accompanying his father and a crew on the family-owned brig carrying a load of grain up the Chesapeake Bay toward Baltimore when a gale came up, taking the lives of the father and the son, and probably others of the crew as well. 36 Byrd's death at the age of about forty-seven left his wife Elizabeth a widow with five young children. From the account of the death of Byrd and his son, it is apparent that the seafaring ways of the man, dating back at least to the war and probably earlier, never left him, regardless of his financial ability to forego the rigors of such journeys. Of the five children left at Byrd's death, only one would survive past 1831, and none of the three males would have children who would survive. Thus, the surname would come to a close in this line. Elizabeth, the mother, died in June, 1807, leaving the five children ranging from about seven to about nineteen years of age. 37 The older of the two daughters, Evelyn Byrd, was born in 1790, married Robert Pollard, Jr., of "Zoar" in King William County, in 1809, had ten children (five of whom survived childhood), and died in 1863. 38 Robert Pollard, Jr., known as Robin, succeeded his father as Clerk of Court of King William County, and was in turn succeeded by two of his sons, then by another member of the family, who is presumed to have been a nephew. Thus, five men of the Pollard family served some seventy-five years in the office (1797-1872, interrupted only for a two-year period by a "carpetbagger" after the war. 39 The other daughter, Mary Eleanor ("Ellen"), born about 1794, married John Camm Pollard, brother of her sister's husband. Thus, the two Chamberlayne sisters married two brothers, just as had their parents and their respective siblings. John and Mary Ellen had one child, Chamberlayne Pollard, born about 1817, before she died in 1818 in her 23rd year. 40 Yet another child lost his mother at an early age. Chamberlayne Pollard, according to Stewart, relocated to Georgia, married and had issue. Much of what is known about the three male children of Byrd and Elizabeth derives from existing records pertaining to Revolutionary War land grant claims, and from records of the King William County Court pertaining to the heirs of Byrd and Elizabeth. A land bounty warrant was issued in 1831 to Evelyn Byrd Pollard and to Chamberlayne Pollard, who were said to be the only surviving heirs of Byrd Chamberlayne. 41 William Dandridge Chamberlayne married Wilhimina (surname unknown) and, according to an 1839 record of the King William Court, "... died intestate leaving two infants of tender years." 42 Hopkins, however, mentions a will dated October 2, 1809 and probated October 24, 1814, which suggests that William D. died in 1814 testate. 43 Whether or not there was a will may not in itself hold much significance, but the fact that the alleged will is said to have left everything to a William H. Madison suggests the possibility that his wife may have been a Madison, although we have no evidence of that. Spotswood D. Chamberlayne, according to the same 1839 court record, "...died testate but under 21," and his will, dated May 14, 1818 was probated August 24 of the same year, leaving everything to his brother and Executor, Thomas Delaware Chamberlayne. 44 Thus, it is apparent that Spotswood was the youngest of the siblings, probably born in 1799 or 1800. There is also the suggestion in this chain of events, although this is conjectural, that Spotswood may have been afflicted with a serious illness or that there may have been some other reason for his early death to have been expected, despite his young age. |
|||||||||
|
Thomas Delaware Chamberlayne survived into adulthood, was married to
Sarah Webb Dandridge, and their one child, daughter Sarah, known as
"Sally," died in 1828 at the age of thirteen.
45
As Thomas was mentioned as her father in Sally's obituary, and not as
deceased, it follows that Thomas died some time between her death
in 1828 and the hearing held in 1831 regarding Byrd's land bounty.
In a conveyance of land by deed in January, 1811, in which members of
the family having an interest in the transaction were named, Spotswood
was said to have been represented by Thomas Delaware, which suggests
that Thomas may have been age twenty-one by that time.
46
If so, his birth year most likely was some time prior to 1790.
He and Sarah had land, according to Harris, near the "Cohoke swamp,"
on the King William side of the Pamunkey not far from Poplar Grove,
but it is not known whether they resided on that land.
47
Thus, with the exception of Evelyn, the children of Byrd and Elizabeth died at relatively young ages, some as early as their late teens, and only Mary Eleanor and Evelyn left any descendants. Thus, the name Chamberlayne did not continue in this line. In 1817, with Thomas Delaware settled elsewhere, and perhaps with knowledge of some fact concerning Spotswood of which we are not aware, Eglington, the family estate for the past two-thirds of a century, was put up for sale. It later was destroyed by fire. 48
|
|||||||||
|
The Ruffin's Ferry parcel was a portion of a larger tract of
land once owned by the Claiborne family and called by them "Windsor."
Earlier, about mid-century, a Capt. William Dancie (or Dancey) had
acquired Windsor and other properties through marriage, and upon the
passing of his wife and his remarriage in the mid-1750s, which resulted
in his relocation to another county, he had sold Windsor to a Robert
Ruffin.
50
Under the latter's proprietorship, a ferry established there
by Dancie had become known as "Ruffin's Ferry." Upon the death of
Robert Ruffin about 1777 the land was divided among his seven children,
and it was from one of these heirs that Edward Pye and Agnes Chamberlayne
purchased their 58-acre estate, a portion of Windsor, with the residence
already constructed. It is unclear whether the Chamberlaynes
or the previous owners gave it the name "Windsor Shades."
It should be noted that there is potential for confusion here, since another place of the same name exists in New Kent County on the Chickahominy River, a few miles east of Providence Forge, near State Route 60. The home of Edward Pye Chamberlayne and his family, however, was in King William County, along the north bank of the Pamunkey. Harris carefully referred to the latter as "Windsor Shades on the Pamunkey," as if it was obvious to him that the place needed to be distinguished from the other, and originally better known Windsor Shades of New Kent. He did not, however, mention the possible confusion over multiple use of the name and it is easy to see how mistakes could be made. 52 Edward and Agnes had four children before her death in 1793, only one of whom survived childhood. Her age at her passing is not known exactly but she was probably in her thirties, leaving her husband and a young son, William Byrd: yet another example of a child losing his mother at an early age. She and her husband, of course, also had to bear the loss of three of their four children. Within a few years Edward had married again, his second wife being Mary Bickerton Webb, of the Webb family of "Chemokins," in New Kent. It has been stated in various sources, some of which probably were taken from one or more of the others, that Mary was the daughter of Lewis Webb and his wife, Mary Bickerton. 53 There is, however, uncertainty in the matter of her parentage. An alternate perspective comes from Harris, whose documentation consists of family bible records of the Webbs, which are quoted extensively, but his footnotes are indecipherable in this section. 54 In order to examine the issues raised by this claim, and because the Webbs are ancestors of the descendants of Lewis Webb and other children of Edward Pye and Mary, it is worthwhile at this stage to consider the Webb family from its origins in Virginia to the marriage of Mary Webb and Edward Pye Chamberlayne. |
|||||||||
|
Some time after Lucy's death in 1750, George Webb married again, his second wife being Anne Bickerton, daughter of Col. John Bickerton of Hanover County. George and Anne had two children, one of whom, born in September, 1756, they named Mary. Of the four surviving children of George and his first wife Lucy, the second oldest was Lewis Webb, who was born in 1731. Lewis was educated at William and Mary, and after his father's death in 1758 became a vestryman at St. Peter's, and later was elected to the General Assembly. He married Elizabeth Bickerton, daughter of Col. John Bickerton, and the sister of his father's second wife, Anne. After George's death in 1758, his widow Anne was left with two young daughters in a household now headed by her stepson and brother-in- law, Lewis, who was about her own age. Thus, Anne's daughter Mary (born in 1756) grew up in the household with her mother, her aunt, and her "half-brother-half-uncle" who most likely was, in effect, a father figure for her. Harris identified four children of Lewis and Elizabeth, none of whom was named Mary, but he acknowledged that there has been some disagreement concerning the children of Lewis and Elizabeth (p.197). If it was Mary, the daughter of George and Anne Bickerton Webb, who married Edward Pye Chamberlayne, she would have been about forty at the date of the marriage with four children ahead of her, and that seems unlikely. Also, there is no evidence that this Mary had the middle name Bickerton, although it is certainly possible. If, on the other hand, there was a daughter named Mary Bickerton born to Lewis and his wife, one not known to Harris, then it is only the attribution of Mary Bickerton as the mother of Mary Bickerton Webb that has been in error, as her name actually was Elizabeth (that is, if Harris got it right). This scenario seems more feasible than the alternative, with Mary Bickerton being born probably about the mid-1760s or so, to put her at a comfortable age in the late 1790s to begin a sequence of four births. Moreover, it is also possible that Elizabeth Bickerton was actually named Mary Elizabeth or Elizabeth Mary, or that Harris simply got the name wrong. In any case, both the Webbs and the Bickertons factor into the ancestry of the descendants of Edward Pye and Mary Chamberlayne. Clearly, additional research into marriage and birth records pertaining to this "web" of uncertainty could prove helpful. |
|||||||||
|
William Byrd Chamberlayne and his descendants.
|
|||||||||
|
William Byrd Chamberlayne was also a lawyer and he served in the Virginia House of Delegates in 1816, 1819, and 1820. William and Nancy had at least five children, although his "family papers," which we presume he compiled, list only the three still surviving at the time. The couple's first two children have in common that they died in early adulthood, and if either was married or had children it is unknown to us. The oldest, Rebecca, was born in 1807 and died in 1829. The next was William Mosby, who was born in 1809 and lived until 1838. Another son, Edwin Harvie, was born in 1816, married Sarah Madison
Scott, was a merchant in Richmond, and lived until 1885. Several
children of Edwin and Sarah survived and had
Lucy Williamson Chamberlayne married Efford Bolling Bentley and they had a number of children, some of whom also had families in turn. Efford Bentley's 5G-grandparents were John Rolfe and Pocahontas. 60 Photo source The youngest child of William Byrd and Nancy was Francis West,
who was born in January, 1833, some twenty-six years after the first
child and twelve years after the next youngest, the year in which
Nancy is believed to have turned forty-six. Francis, the family's
late addition, was
|
| ||||||||
|
The three children of William Byrd and Nancy Chamberlayne of whom anything is known, Edwin, Lucy, and Francis, had a total of twenty-six children, and many of them married and had issue themselves, resulting in a comparatively rapid growth branch of the family during this era, reaching well into the 20th century. At least for the present, and because this is not the ancestral line of the author, no further effort has been made to pursue these descendancies. Further research, which might already have been done without being known to us, could yield a great deal of information on these descendants of William Byrd and Ann Mosby Chamberlayne.
Lucy Parke Chamberlayne, who is thought to have been born in 1799 or 1800, married Robert Carter Williamson, of "Brook Hill," Henrico County, in 1818. They had two children, Robert Carter, Jr., and Mary Amanda. Lucy died in 1822, yielding another case of young children losing their mother at early ages. The 1830 census showed her husband Robert C. Williamson, age 30-39, living alone in Henrico County, with no indication of where the children were at the time. Nothing further is known to us of the son, Robert Carter, Jr., but the 1850 census showed Mary Amanda, then age 29, and her husband, John Stewart, a native of Scotland, age 44, and their three young children, Mary Amanda, 6, Isobel, 3, and Marion, 10 months. John was listed as a farmer and their estate, known as "Brook Hill," was valued at $25,000. In time, the couple had a total of seven daughters. The oldest, Mary Amanda, married a Thomas Pinckney, of Charleston, SC, and they named a child Charles Cotesworth Pinckney after Thomas' ancestor, the noted 18th Century political figure of the same name from South Carolina who was a signer of the Declaration of Independence. 63 Elizabeth Mary Chamberlayne, whose date of birth is unknown, married Sterling Ruffin of "Sweet Hall," along the Pamunkey River in King William County. They had one son, James Edward Ruffin, who married Mary Cooke South, and died in 1841 without children. 64 An item in Stewart's History of the Virginia Navy provides a clue as to the latest that Elizabeth could have been living: "In USP is the petition of Wm. Byrd Chamberlayne, Lewis W. Chamberlayne, James Edward Ruffin, sole heir of Eliz. B. Ruffin, and Robert and Mary A. Williamson, only heirs of Lucy Parke Williamson" (p.165). No date was attached to this petition, but because James Edwin Ruffin died in 1841, and because he was still alive at this time while his mother was not, Elizabeth can be said to have died before 1841. Byrd Chamberlayne was born, it is believed, in 1801, almost surely named for his uncle who had died at sea the previous December. In 1822 he married Mary Robertson Sully of Charleston, South Carolina, and they had at least six children. Two primary sources on the family named five of the children, and a sixth, Charles Edward, is known through a reference to his baptism in 1839. 65 It is presumed that Charles died young, since he is not listed by the sources apparently following the tradition of naming the surviving children. A partial trail of the family of Byrd and Mary can be followed in various census documents. The 1830 census shows Byrd and his family residing in the Monroe District of West Richmond, with two children, a male and a female, under five years of age. The family's residence in the city may have had some bearing on Byrd's decision to sell his share of the Revolutionary War bounty land which was distributed to the heirs of his father in 1835. 66 The census of 1860 for Henrico County, 2nd Ward of the City of Richmond, shows Byrd at age 59, with the occupation of clerk and with real estate valued at $200, along with his wife Mary, 55, and their two youngest sons, "R.C.M." (Richard Channing Moore), age 19 and a clerk, and Spotswood, age 16. Both Richard and Spotswood, as well as their older brother James, served in the Army of the Confederacy. Richard, who began as a private and rose to the rank of lieutenant, served in the 46th Virginia infantry, and the 1st Light Artillery Batallion. No trace of Richard has been found after the war. 67 Elsewhere in Richmond in the 1860 census was a James R. Chamberlayne, age 29, a bookkeeper, with $600 in real property, residing with his wife and three children, all under five years of age. His wife Rosetta, age 23, although born in New Jersey, had lived in Richmond since about the age of ten. The 1870 census showed James and Rosetta and their four children living in the household headed by her father, Dr. George B. Plume, a physician. Rosetta's younger brother Joseph, then age 22, was said to have been born in Virginia, while her sister Annie, 24, was born in Maryland, which suggests that the Plumes may have moved to Richmond some 22-24 years earlier, when Rosetta was about ten. Some time before 1880 James and his son "Jamie," then twelve years old, relocated to Jersey City, NJ, as is evidenced in the 1880 census, but there is no indication of Rosetta or any other children being with with them, or whether the move was even permanent. While it appears fairly clear that this was James Robertson Chamberlayne, the second son of Byrd and Mary, born about 1831, there remains some uncertainty due to the existence of another James R. Chamberlayne in the 1850 census. This "other" James R. was a son of Lucy and the late John Chamberlayne, whose place, if any, in the descendancy from William and Elizabeth of Poplar Grove is unknown at this time. This James was said to be age 15, a "gardener" by occupation, with two older brothers, John (21) and Curtis (19), as well as a younger brother and sister. 68 Both of these James R. Chamberlaynes served in the Army of the Confederacy during the Civil War, one as a Captain, the other as an enlisted man. 69 No evidence is at hand to distinguish which James R. was of which rank. Further complicating matters is that there were also two James R. Chamberlaynes in the succeeding generation, both born about 1867 or 1868. Findings from the census of 1920 and the Richmond City Directory of 1889/90 (a best available proxy for the lost census of 1890 which was destroyed by fire) show multiple listings under this name. 70 While there is fairly reliable evidence that one James R. Chamberlayne in each listing was the grandson of John and Lucy (and the son of their son John and his wife, also named Lucy), it is not clear who the other was, and there is no substantial evidence to conclude that it was "Jamie," the grandson of Byrd and Mary. Further grappling with the available information on this puzzle remains for subsequent attention. The youngest son of Byrd and Mary, Spotswood, appears in the censuses of 1870 and 1880 with a wife, Frances, and, by 1880, four children: Mary E. (14), Virginia T. (11), George S. (9), and Rettie B. M. (5). Spotswood's occupation is listed there as a clerk in a store. Listings of soldiers in the Confederate Army in the Civil War show an "S. D." Chamberlayne as a private in Company A of the 10th Virginia Cavalry, and a "Spot" Chamberlayne as a private in Company H of the 9th Virginia Cavalry. He also has been cited as a member of a group known as "Lee Rangers," although the source noting his presence there also listed him as "dead," apparently an error, at least if "S.D." was Spotswood, the son of Byrd and Mary. 71 As for the two oldest of the children of the family, Mary Elizabeth is believed to have married Herman R. Baldwin in May, 1852, but nothing further is known of the couple. As for Lewis Webb, just enough of a trace has been found to suggest that he survived at least into adulthood. A Richmond City Directory listing for 1889/90 (used as a proxy for the 1890 census which was lost to fire) shows an Ann S. Chamberlayne, widow of Lewis Webb. 72 The Chamberlayne residence during the era of Edward Pye and his two wives, "Windsor Shades," was sold in 1822 by his son Byrd and his daughter Elizabeth Ruffin. The absence of his wife Mary from the list of persons involved in the transaction suggests that Mary had passed on by this date. 73
|
|||||||||
|
For the descendants of William and Elizabeth Chamberlayne of Poplar Grove, the period from the outbreak of the war through about the first third of the 19th century was marked by some notable highs and some lamentable lows. Certainly the Revolutionary War records of Byrd and Edward, including their capture at sea and subsequent escapes from a British prison, as well as the distinguished military career of Brigadier General William Chamberlayne, from his youthful service in the Revolution to his prominent role in the War of 1812, stand out among the accomplishments of family members during this period. Among the misfortunes for the family were the infamous "Posey Affair," which resulted in the death by hanging of the husband of Anne Kidley, daughter of Richard and Mary, and the deaths at sea of Byrd and his young son Otway in a cold gale in December, 1800. Also on the negative side of the ledger were the consequences of the harsh demographic realities of the era. Like many families, the Chamberlaynes and allied families of the period endured a great many losses of newborn or otherwise young children, on the order of about one in three. Survival prospects beyond childhood also were far less favorable than they are today. Of family members who lived beyond childhood about one third failed to make it past age thirty. Survival past age seventy was the fortune of only about one in five (estimating on the basis of age-of-death data with many gaps). With the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828, the first era of the United States of America is sometimes said to passed in favor of the second, the "Age of Jacksonian Democracy." The Chamberlaynes of Virginia, the young nation's most aristocratic region, had enjoyed a privileged place in the old social order that was beginning to give ground to a new order, albeit ever so slightly and slowly. If the "haves" and the "have nots" were remaining essentially the same in most respects, there was a gradual shift beginning in the way the haves made their livings and attempted to maintain their privileged places in society. Cities were starting to grow, commercial enterprise was expanding, and the professions were becoming more central to the functioning of the new order. The year 1828 thus offers a suitable point for another "cross sectional" view of the evolving Chamberlayne family as it began to make its way into the new era. General William Chamberlayne was still at Poplar Grove in 1828, living the life of the country squire, raising and racing horses, among his other pastimes, and still serving the state legislature. It is not clear whether Peggy was there with him, although she is believed to have been still alive. Also in New Kent, Ann Kidley Chamberlayne Cooke, now in her seventies, was at North Green with her several grandchildren whose parents had died during the past few years. In her care were the three sons, ages six through thirteen, of her son, William Cooke, Jr., who had died two years earlier, and the daughter of her daughter, Ann Kidley Cooke Binns, who was then about twenty. In King William County, both Eglington and Windsor Shades had been sold, as had the old Claiborne Hall estate across the Pamunkey from Poplar Grove. Of the children of Byrd and Elizabeth, both long deceased, there remained only two in 1828. Evelyn Byrd (Chamberlayne) Pollard and her family were residing at "Zoar," her husband the esteemed County Clerk. Thomas Delaware Chamberlayne was still there, although his wife's status is unknown, and it was in that year, in September, that his daughter Sally died at the age of thirteen. Byrd's brother Thomas B. and his wife Elizabeth most likely were gone by this time, but it is likely that they had a son, Thomas B. Jr., who was living in King William at the time with his family. Of the children of Edward Pye Chamberlayne, of Windsor Shades, who was long deceased by 1828, three sons were married with growing families, at least two of them living in Henrico County, engaged in professional careers in the burgeoning urban center of Richmond. The oldest son, William Byrd, and his wife Nancy were in their forties in 1828, with five children ranging in age from seven to twenty-one, one of whom would die within the next year or so. Dr. Lewis Webb Chamberlayne, a Richmond physician, and his wife Martha were living at "Montrose" in Henrico with at least one, and possibly two or three, young children. During this period, however, they were enduring a succession of deaths of their children, as well as the deafness of their first, Edward Pye, which resulted in his being mute as well. Another child of the couple would be born deaf a few years later, and part of the story of Lewis Webb Chamberlayne, reserved for Part Three, concerns his response to the deafness of two of his sons. The third of the brothers, Byrd, and his wife Mary, both in their twenties, were residing in Richmond in 1828 with one or two young children. One of the daughters of Edward Pye and Mary, Elizabeth Mary Ruffin of Sweet Hall in King William, was, we presume, still alive with her husband Sterling and young son, James Edward. With the passing of Gen. William Chamberlayne in 1836 came the end of the family's tenure of more than a century at Poplar Grove in New Kent County. Thus, by about the end of the first third of the 19th century the Chamberlaynes remained a part of the Pamunkey River area only through women whose surnames, and whose children's surnames, were now Pollard, Cooke, or Otey. The Chamberlaynes by this time had become primarily a Richmond family, with modest estates in Henrico their closest remaining ties to the plantation era of the first century in Virginia.
|
|||||||||