MLS in Atlanta? Are You Kidding?
by Chris Allen
March 2000
Copyright © 2000
"Earlier this week, Garber was in Atlanta, meeting with several soccer
community forces such as former North American Soccer League commissioner
Phil Woosnam, to discuss the possibility of a team in that city."
Michael Lewis, MLS
has fresh faces, different alignment, high hopes
Here we go again, touting Atlanta as the next untapped MLS market.
I've lived in northeast Georgia for 14 years -- and still spend part
of each year in New England -- so perhaps it would be good to have a little
perspective on this.
Before people get too excited about Atlanta as an MLS city, let's step
back and take a look at the pros and cons:
Pros:
-
Huge youth and amateur soccer community
-
Rapidly growing latino (mostly Mexican) community
-
Rapid population and economic growth rate
-
Almost year round capacity to play outdoors
Cons:
-
For all of the pro team sports since 1965, this place has to be one
of the biggest front-running cities I've ever seen. When teams start to
do well (Braves in early 90s, Hawks in late 80s, Falcons 2 years ago) people
come out of the woodwork like they are giving away free money at the stadia.
But when teams start to do poorly, thousands come to games cleverly disguised
as empty seats. Fickle doesn't even begin to describe the pro sports "fans"
here.
-
Despite all the protestations, this is still an auto racing and college
sports town. Very simply, pro sports have not been here long enough to
establish the kind of really committed roots that pro sports fans develop
in Boston, New York, Philly, Detroit, DC, Chicago, and a few other large
cities with pro sports traditions that date back over a century.
-
We've all heard from the days of the NASL that the youth soccer means
that soccer is the sport of the future. The "future" is now, people. Until
we can turn these kids and their parents into pro socccer FANS who come
to games, we have a problem.
-
If the experience in other US cities which rapidly growing latino
populations is similar, there will have to be high quality soccer with
at least a few recognizable quality latinos on the team, or these fans
will keep watching their local amateur leagues, and televised games on
Univision, Telemundo, and Galavision.
-
If past support for minor league pro soccer is essential for MLS
expansion -- and I think it ought to be criterion #1 -- then Atlanta fails
miserably. There have been so many owners of A-League and USL teams in
Atlanta since the early 90s that my head spins even trying to keep track
of the personnel. Too many incompetent -- if not actually criminal -- activities
have been done in the name of pro soccer in Atlanta in the last decade
to sour even the most diehard pro soccer fan. Until the A-League Silverbacks
are consistently averaging 7,000-8,000 fans a game, putting an MLS team
in Atlanta is sheer insanity.
-
Atlanta Soccer "Village"? Only in Atlanta would the people leading the
charge for a physical presence entitle something as a "village" when they
are nowhere near to selecting a physical location. People, "village" is
a physical entity not a virtual one. And if you check out their website
Atlanta Soccer Village
you'll see that the thing hasn't been updated in months. Talk to me when
the shovel hits the dirt.
Bottom line, if MLS is looking for expansion sites, don't come here
now. All you'll get is another Miami or at best another Tampa Bay. Before
anybody even thinks seriously of coming to Atlanta, there better be teams
in Houston, Philly, Detroit, Portland, Seattle, San Diego and Rochester.
Back to Chris Allen's "Shots at Goal" Page
Back to Chris Allen's Main Soccer Page