Conclusions
The analysis was correct as indicated by the fact that the outputs from all three methods of analysis yielded similar results. The values of the output (lift bar) are compared in the table below for graphical, analytical and Working Model.
Data Points |
|
Ram INPUT |
|
|
Graphical OUTPUT |
|
|
|
Analytical OUTPUT |
|
|
|
Working Model OUTPUT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velocity |
Acceleration |
|
Height |
Velocity (@90 deg) |
Acceleration (@270 deg) |
|
Height |
Velocity (@90 deg) |
Acceleration (@270 deg) |
|
Height |
Velocity (@90 deg) |
Acceleration (@270 deg) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0.5 in/s |
0 |
|
1.4 in |
1.6in/s |
.085in/s^2 |
|
1.34 in |
1.62 in/s |
.085 in/s^2 |
|
1.34 in |
1.60 in/s |
.082 in/s^2 |
15 |
|
0.5 in/s |
0 |
|
4.0 in |
1.5in/s |
.088in/s^2 |
|
3.97 in |
1.47 in/s |
.086 in/s^2 |
|
3.98 in |
1.45 in/s |
.083 in/s^2 |
30 |
|
0.5 in/s |
0 |
|
7.8 in |
1.15in/s |
.08in/s^2 |
|
7.69 in |
1.24 in/s |
.08 in/s^2 |
|
7.71 in |
1.23 in/s |
.076 in/s^2 |
45 |
|
0.5 in/s |
0 |
|
10.8 in |
1.0in/s |
.07in/s^2 |
|
10.87 in |
1.02 in/s |
.075 in/s^2 |
|
10.87 in |
1.03 in/s |
.073 in/s^2 |
60 |
|
0.5 in/s |
0 |
|
13.3 in |
0.8in/s |
.085in/s^2 |
|
13.32 in |
0.81 in/s |
.088 in/s^2 |
|
13.33 in |
.82 in/s |
.086 in/s^2 |
70 |
|
0.5 in/s |
0 |
|
14.4 in |
0.7in/s |
.125in/s^2 |
|
14.45 in |
0.65 in/s |
.124 in/s^2 |
|
14.46 in |
.67 in/s |
.125 in/s^2 |
