Green, Johnson, Kennison, and Gonzalez Combined Production:

AVERAGE POINTS PER GAME: 62.7

AVERAGE POINTS WHEN CHIEFS SCORE 0-19 IN GAME: 35 (20% of games)

AVERAGE POINTS WHEN CHIEFS SCORE 20-29 IN GAME: 62.4 (50% of games)

AVERAGE POINTS WHEN CHIEFS SCORE 30+ IN GAME: 78.7 (30% of games)

AVERAGE FANTASY POINTS FOR ALL TEAMS IN 2005: 76.178 GAMES

4 STARTERS SCORED ABOVE LEAGUE AVG FOR ENTIRE TEAMS: 30% (3/10 games, 86pt avg - outscored league team average by 10 points)

GAMES 4 STARTERS SCORED WITHIN 28pts LEAGUE AVG FOR ENTIRE TEAMS: 50% (5/10 games - required 7 pts from remaining 4 starters to meet league team average)

GAMES 4 STARTERS SCORED AT LEAST 28pts OR HIGHER VS. LEAGUE AVG FOR ENTIRE TEAMS: 80% (8/10 games)

RECORD FOR 4 STARTERS VS. FULL TEAMS PER WEEK: 32W - 52L (38.1 Winning %) That's right: Only starting Green, Gonzalez, Kennison, and Johnson (and not playing a K, DEF, 2nd RB, or 2nd WR) versus the actual performance of entire fantasy teams each week would have resulted in an almost 40% winning percentage. Boner move? I think not.