| (1) | mI a = F ; | (2) | FG = G MG mG r -2. |
Galileo's experimental dicsovery of equal accelerations for all free falling bodies demands that the ratio
must be the same for all bodies. Proper adjustment of G
makes this ratio equal to 1, and . But this last equation states only
that numbers representing both masses are equal, whereas their meanings are different. Consequently the product
, with r being Earth's radius, must represent
a gravity acceleration . Thus, for small bodies near the
Earth surface the Newton's law of gravity is reduced to the very popular relation W = mg . Here W
stands for a body weight, and it represents a gravity force exerted by Earth on this body, whereas m is de facto
a gravity mass of the body. This result clearly shows that weighting bodies means finding their gravitational masses.
If we want to measure explicitly body's inertial mass, the Newton's second
law must be used. Applying to the body a known constant force and measuring body's acceleration we can calculate from the Newton's second
law (Eq. (1)) body's inertial mass. This mass can be compared with gravitational mass obtained by means of weighting to show students
that numbers representing both masses with accuracy of a few percent are equal. Such accuracy, of course, is very poor if compared with
Eotvos results from the end of nineteenth century, but process of finding a mass of an object without weighting it helps students in better
understanding of inertial and gravitational masses.
![]() |
| Fig.1 |
![]() |
| Fig.2 |
If we disregard friction forces, the only force causing acceleration of the system is the gravity force acting upon the hanger and sloted weights there. Then, the accelerating force F is given by the product mH g, where mH is a mass of the hanger and sloted weights there. A graph of the force vs. acceleration for our particular experiment is shown in Fig.3.
![]() |
| Fig.3 |
A linearity of this graph verifies the Newton's second law,
and the graph slope represents the inertial mass of the system. This mass contains the inertial mass of all weights, inertial mass of the
glider, and roughly a half of inertial mass of the pulley. If the pulley were a uniform cylinder then a kinetic energy of its rotational motion
could be expressed as mPv2/4, where v is a speed of its edge, which is the
same as a speed of the glider. The additional factor 1/2, as compared with a kinetic energy of a point-like mass, appears because an
inertia moment of a cylinder with respect to its symmetry axis is given by mCRC2/2,
where mC and RC are the mass and radius of the cylinder respectively.
Thus, the inertial mass of the system should be compared with an
"effective" gravitational mass of the system which contains only a half of the gravitational mass of the pulley. In our case the gravitational
masses of the glider (with the fin and paper clip), pulley and sloted weights (including the hanger) were 0.160 kg, 0,004 kg and 0.040 kg
respectively. This makes an "effective" gravitational mass of the system to be equal to 0.202 kg, which differs only by a one gramm from the
measured inertial mass of the system.
Led by the PSIgate team at the University of Manchester, PSIgate is a free online catalogue of high quality Internet resources in the physical sciences. Resources are selected, catalogued and indexed by researchers and other specialists in their respective fields.