<<<home page

 

 

Conferences on the Virtues

By Fr. Bruno Cocuzzi, ocd

 

Number 82

 

Piety

 

We continue with Section D of that part of the Treatise on the Cardinal Virtue of Justice that considers two more virtues affiliated with Justice, namely, Piety and Observance.

 

Chapter 1 – Piety

 

Question 1 – The nature of Piety

 

Piety is the virtue that inclines us to render to our parents and to our country due honor and cooperation.  It is a virtue because it tends to perfect the individual as a human being and citizen, and it pertains to justice because honor and cooperation are things we owe to both parents and nation.

 

Piety is a virtue analogous to the virtue of Religion because by it we acknowledge our parents; on the one hand, as the secondary authors of our being, as well as the persons, whose care, protection and guidance helped us to become mature, responsible adults.

 

On the other hand, by it we acknowledge the fact that it is our country that has maintained, fostered and protected the necessary social fabric within which we were born and raised.

 

Piety also extends to the rendering of due honor and respect to our blood relatives (because of their relationship to our parents) and to our fellow citizens.  They are the ones who made up the familial and social fabric that was so important to our well being and development as we were growing up.

 

My author makes some interesting observations about Piety that help us to see it in proper perspective:

 

1.      The Debt we owe to our parents is a strict and legal one because it corresponds to a strict and legal right they have to be honored and respected by us, their children.

 

Piety, however, is not Justice in the strict sense because the virtue of Justice is based upon a distinction of persons, one of whom enjoys a right, to which corresponds the other person’s duty or obligation.

 

In the case of the virtue of Piety, children and parents are not considered as distinct entities relating one to another on an equal footing.  Children always are considered [traditionally] in some way conjoined to their parents and forming a single unit with them.

 

Again, Piety is not Justice because the latter virtue requires that there be equality between what is rendered by the debtor and the right to receive satisfaction on the part of the creditor.  Ordinarily (we are talking about normal, functional families) children can never make an adequate return to their parents for the gift of life in the first place, nor for the upbringing and education the parents have provided at great cost to themselves, thereafter.

 

2.      Piety is not the same as Legal Justice.

 

The latter concerns the duties and obligations citizens owe their country considered as the author of the common good.

 

The former concerns the esteem and reverence we owe our country as the author of our individual good as citizens.

 

3.      Because God is the creator [primary author of our being and existence}, and indeed, because it is He who gives to parents the faculty (the power and the right) to become parents, the virtue of Religion is a kind of super-eminent piety.

 

But because God has, by Sanctifying grace, adopted us as children into His family, we can formally exercise the virtue of Piety toward Him, as well.  Indeed, in additional to the moral virtue of Piety, we have been given the supernatural virtue of piety as a Gift of the Holy Spirit.  By means of it we show due honor and reverence to God as Our Father, and to all human beings as His [actual or potential] children.

           

4.      The name [and attribute] of Piety can be extended to Works of Mercy [and to God] because of the similarity in what they achieve.

 

The Works of Mercy are pretty much the same as the deeds of Piety, which we exhibit, ordinarily, to those joined to us by ties of blood, friendship and citizenship.  Besides, we tend to consider those who habitually do works of mercy to be pious people.

 

We may even think of God Himself as being Pious, because His goodness extends in a special way to those who are members of His family by grace.  But neither does He withhold that same goodness to all other human beings.  It is toward the former that His Piety is most in evidence, and it is toward the latter that His Mercy best manifests itself.

 

There is a difference, though, between Piety and Mercy, because the good works of Piety are done out of a sense of debt to family members, whereas the works of mercy proceed out of a compassionate desire freely to bring relief to the sufferer, whomever he/she may be.

 

Question 2 – Pious Duties Toward Parents

 

Both natural Law and Divine Positive Law place upon us a grave obligation to manifest certain things to our parents which they have a right to in virtue of their being our parents.

 

First among these is to surround them with love.  We owe them this because, next to God, they are the beings most closely related to us, and our greatest benefactors.

Next, we owe them honor and reverence because they are our superiors (as parents) in dignity and excellence.

 

Third, we owe them obedient service in so far as they are the ones God has given us to be our guides and protectors on the road to adulthood.

 

(We owe our parents all of the above regardless of any other considerations or circumstances).

 

Fourth, when circumstances require it, we owe our parents spiritual and temporal assistance and relief.

 

The first of the above duties arises out of natural love and charity, the natural basis of all piety.

 

The second and third are properly and formally deeds of piety toward parents.

 

The fourth arises out of both natural charity and piety.

 

Hence, any sins of hatred, ill-will, personal injury or contempt which would be considered slight and of little account in regard to others, could easily become grave when committed against parents, and would acquire an additional dimension of sinfulness, that is impiety.

 

The Duty of Love and Assistance…

 

The duty [imposed by Piety] upon children to surround their parents with love extends to both affection in the hart and external evidence in word and deed.

 

Internal affection includes sincerely desiring the very best for our parents, and the external evidence requires that we both pray for their spiritual and temporal welfare and exhibit visible marks or signs of love and esteem, at the very least.

 

Not satisfied with these very general and necessarily vague expressions of the duties of children toward parents, my textbook proceeds to give several specific examples and instances.

 

A.     It would be a grievous sin of:

 

1.      Lack of internal affection were children to

 

a.      allow feelings of hatred for their parents to dwell in their hearts, and internally despise them

b.      feel happy when misfortune befalls them or to feel sad when they enjoy prosperity

c.      (more seriously) to desire that evil befall them

d.      to desire their death only because they (the children) want to live a more licentious life, or because they want to get possession of their inheritance, or because they want to be relieved of the care and custody of the parents.

 

2.      Lack of external evidence of love were children to

 

a.      manifest signs of hatred toward their parents

b.      speak ill of them to others

c.      do things that cause them grief, especially to provoke them to tears by, for example:

 

i.                 by keeping bad company

ii.                by neglecting their studies

iii.               by staying out very late at night

(remember, this treatise on the Cardinal virtues was written prior o World War II)

 

B.     It would be a sin of

 

1.      Withholding due temporal assistance were children to

 

a.      fail to supply for their parents’ bodily and material needs.  This is true, even if the parents were able to support themselves, but in a manner that would be beneath their dignity.

b.      Fail to visit them when they are ill

c.      Fail to console them when they are sad or discouraged

d.      Fail to protect them against harmful influences or vexing situations

 

The obligation to provide due temporal assistance is so serious that St. Thomas Aquinas teaches that children would be obliged to defer entrance into religious life or into the state of marriage, and even to forego them completely, if the parents are in such dire need that only by remaining in the world and unmarried could the said children be able to assist them.

 

As justification, St. Thomas states that the obligation to show Piety toward parents is of the Natural Law, whereas entering Religious Life or the Married State is only a personal option.

 

He goes on to say, further, that children could even be obliged to leave the religious life, should that become an absolute necessity in order to give due assistance to desperately needy parents.  But he adds that this hardly ever becomes necessary, and if so, it is usually only for a short time.

 

(Perhaps someone might object that Our Lord said:  He who loves father and mother… more than Me, is not worthy of Me.  How can that be reconciled to the above teaching of St. Thomas?

 

I think we have to say that a statement of Jesus that is of more fundamental importance is His censure of the principle of the Chief Priests, Pharisees and Scribes of His time which allowed them to say to their parents:  Any assistance you might have had from me is Korban (dedicated to God).

 

Jesus then said that this enabled them to refuse to assist their parents in their bodily and material needs, and thus effectively to nullify the fourth commandment:  Honor thy father and thy mother.)

 

2.      Withholding due spiritual assistance were children to

 

a.      neglect to advise their parents of the fact that they (the parents) are in danger of death.

b.      Fail to arrange for them to receive the sacraments when in danger of death

c.      Unfairly to prevent them from making arrangements for the good of their immortal souls by bequests for masses when the parents make their wills

d.      Fail to carry out the parents’ serious instructions with regard to funeral services and burial once the parents are deceased.

 

Interestingly, my author says that children are not obliged to pay the debts of deceased parents.  That surely has to be because the civil law provides that the just debts of a deceased person are to be paid from the assets of his/her estate.

 

                                    Exceptions are:

 

a.      When the children inherit (i.e., choose to take over rather than sell) a business or other income producing property left by the parents: and

b.      When otherwise the good name or the honor of the parents would be prejudiced.

 

The duty of honor and reverence…

 

Honor and reverence (they go hand in hand) toward parents are to be both interior and exterior, as in the case of the love that their children owe them.

 

            The interior elements include:

 

1.      acknowledging with the intellect that the parents are our superiors in dignity, excellence and authority in so far as they preeminently participated with God both as the origin of our being and existence, as well as our providential guides and protectors while we were growing up, and

 

2.      a filial fear of hurting them in any way. 

 

The exterior elements include any and all words, comportment and conduct that give accurate expression to the interior elements.

 

Although we have placed the interior elements first, it is clear that the interior dispositions of children toward their parents become evident only through the external, visible behavior of the children toward them.

 

In this respect, there is no middle ground.  The mere absence of any signs either of respect or disrespect in the presence of parents is of itself a violation of this duty, enjoined by the 4th commandment.

 

The Duty of Obedience…

 

This duty is of paramount importance while the children are growing up, obviously, since the parents have a very serious obligation to see to the intellectual, moral and spiritual education of the children.  Once the children are grown up and living independent lives, the duty ceases.

 

Nevertheless, adult children living under the parents’ roof must still obey them in all that concerns the smooth and harmonious running of the household.

 

With regard to the selection of a State in Life, the children remain free to choose, as a personal option, in response to the grace of God.  Though the parents cannot coerce children to embrace one vocation or another, it pertains to their spiritual education that the parents make their children well aware of all the possible vocations to which the grace of God may urge them.

 

Finally, all that is stated here with regard to parents is owed by children to those persons who take the place of parents who are deceased or incapacitated, or to whom is given a share of the parental role and authority in the upbringing of the children, such as teachers.

 

Post-finally, when live-in servants are engaged to assist parents in the running of the household, they, too, owe to the Masters of the House reverence and cooperation akin to that owed by the children.

 

Furthermore, servants are obliged to be discreet with regard to making known what transpires within the household.  Piety, for servants, includes, therefore, safeguarding the good name of the family.

 

 

 

 

 

 

MISSION STATEMENT: This web site was created for the purpose of completing the work of Fr. Bruno Cocuzzi, O.C.D These conferences may be reproduced for private use only. Publication of this material is forbidden without permission of the Father Provincial for the Discalced Carmelites, Holy Hill, 1525 Carmel Rd., Hubertus, WI 53033-9770.     

 

 

 

 

 

<<<home page