| |








|
|
|
Preface
Like
many people , I was introduced to the character of el Zorro
by watching the weekly Disney series that first aired in the fall
of 1957. Captivated by the dashing prankster, I could not
then have imagined that he was just a fictional character, or that
the
“real”
Zorro might not have looked or sounded exactly like the actor
Guy Williams, who brought him so vividly to life. Not until
I was much older did I find out that there had been a Tyrone Power
Zorro and a Douglas Fairbanks Zorro. But even
then, I could never have anticipated the George Hamilton Zorro
or the Antonio Banderas Zorro, with its lavish sets and costumes,
its sophisticated special effects and its attempts to incorporate
Mexican history.
Now,
many years later, having seen all of the above, and having read
Johnston McCulley’s original pulp fiction tale and several other
Zorro novels, I feel at least somewhat qualified to make
comparisons. So let me begin by acknowledging some of the
obvious criticisms that have been leveled at the Disney Zorro
over the years:
Clearly,
Williams’ portrayal wasn’t entirely faithful to McCulley’s foppish
Don Diego Vega, who, by the standards of the 1950's, would have
been considered too effeminate. Nor did his portrayal of el
Zorro even hint at the more sinister side of an outlaw who sometimes
stole money, whipped men with bull whips and carved bloody Z’s into
their foreheads before he killed them.
Disney in the 1950’s also had a curious sense of education as a
possession, something which, like “culture,” it was assumed one
could own, like a set of encyclopedias. But it wasn’t supposed
to transform the person who acquired it.
So while Diego did occasionally mention “philosophy,” we
are told in the first episode that he really is a “man of action”
who just pretends to be “a man of letters,” as if the two were somehow
mutually exclusive.
The Disney writers were also smug enough in one episode
to imply that Diego’s status as an outlaw with a price on his head
gave him an understanding of victimization equal to that of a poor
young vaquero who leads an uprising against an oppressive tyrant.
This isn’t unlike saying that, for having spent a weekend in a motor
home, Donald Trump knows what it’s like to grow up in a trailer
court.
Moreover, like many shows of the 1950’s, Disney’s Zorro catered
to a few unfortunate stereotypes: the fat, stupid, lazy Mexicans,
the primitive Indians, the homely but shrewd spinsters, the treacherous
dark ladies, the spitfires, the wide-eyed bar maid who knew that
beneath his mask, el Zorro was handsome because, “there are
some things you just know, if you are a girl.”
In
fact, no character was especially well rounded. Bad guys were
bad guys, plain and simple. No motive more complicated than
moustache-twirling greed drove the evil Capitan Monastario
to pursue poor Nacho Torres, who was himself little more than a
stock good guy who agonized over his part in the persecution of
the mission Indians.
Even
Don Alejandro, a widower for many years, never seemed to miss his
wife, or to worry what might happen if his only son ever actually
did take up the sword. My parents were squeamish about lending
me the car keys, let alone seeing me engage in war protests or civil
rights marches. Yet even after learning Diego’s secret, Alejandro
was always strangely eager to see Zorro ride.
Nonetheless,
with all that said, we must also acknowledge that there is a kind
of magic in the Disney Zorro, whether we attribute it to
the actor, the producer, the writers, the directors, or simply to
the spirit of el Zorro himself. For it does seem almost
as if the character Williams brought to life took on a life of his
own—one that, like the spirit of Cervantes’ Quixote, managed to
rise above and perhaps even to possess his creators.
The
charm of this particular Zorro was so compelling that I suspect
he left a deeper mark on the imaginations of my generation than
any of his predecessors managed to leave on theirs. Even now,
he seems able to reach out to younger viewers, carving his own playful
Z on their hearts, inspiring them to dream up even more adventures.
Through them, he does indeed live on.
       
|
|
| |
|
|