|
To Bathe or Not to Bathe? By Jason Vines A male of the
species Homo sapiens is covered by brownish mire
of a dry and caked nature; many flakes of dirt and grime are left by him everywhere he
goes. Smell-wise, the emissions put off by him are, beyond the shadow of a doubt, odious
and mephitic. Hordes of infinitesimally-sized creatures, which have negative effects
health-wise, are littered in the males every pore and crevice. This male is, of
course, an example of the types of Homo sapienshereafter
known as humanswho do not wash themselves with any regularity. In no uncertain
terms, such a condition that results from this lack of bathing is to be avoided by humans.
Humans, in order to attain an appearance of cleanliness, to achieve the elimination of
microbial organisms that cover the epidermis, and to eliminate negative olfactory
effusions, should undertake to cleanse themselves well and often. Ambassadors of
certain European cultures, which shall not be identified, might object to a notion of this
nature, by saying that the hydrogen oxidealso known as waterrequired for the
bathing-type task would cost an excessive amount money-wise. But the financial hardships
that might be experienced by the type of individual who bathes him- or herself with
regularity do not outweigh the positive results of the frequent bath. For example,
looks-wise, words cannot express the often splendid effects of bathing. The skin of a
frequent bather has an appearance of cleanliness, with no extraneous particles to be seen
by others. In addition, the hair will be looked upon as the paragon of style and elegance.
On the other hand, the type of person who chooses not to bathe with any great frequency
will have both skin and hair that is covered by flakes of dirt and dust and mud and muck.
Needless to say, Swamp Thing will be the image that is evoked by such a person. Also, the trials
and tribulations experienced by the types of humans who do not bathe with any great
frequency will be great and many. Insidious monsters that are so miniscule that they
cannot be seen will launch massive little assaults upon the body of the infrequent bather.
These assaults can result in myriad lumps of mucus being ejected from the nose and the
mouth or in fountains of blood being ejaculated from those orifices. That such events are
to be evaded should be as plain as day. In order to achieve this evasion, regular bathing
is required. The soap that is used in the bath helps to achieve the elimination of the
tiny invaders that would like for illness and pestilence to be undergone by the human
species. Therefore, fantastic effects salubrity-wise are felt by humans who cleanse
themselves with regularity. Another excellent
effect of the regular bath is the elimination of horribly pungent body odors. If a human
does not bathe, then the smells put off by the human reek of bodily waste and dried sweat.
In this day and age, emissions of that nature, smell-wise, are not tolerated by most
humans. Individuals of whom such emissions are representative will always find their
vicinities vacated in a swift manner by their fellows. As a result, a human who smells of
dung and musk will have a terrible life, social-wise. If that is to be avoided, bathing is
the only option. The accumulated waste products that contribute to horrendous body odor
will be gotten rid of by bathing often. Consequently, smells of a pleasant nature
characterize people who take baths all the time. To make a long
story short, bathing is an enterprise that must be embarked upon by humans. The
application of soapy-type water, on a regular schedule, to the epidermis and to the hair,
has many effects of a spectacular nature for the human. The external appearance of the
body, looks-wise, is good and clean in nature; the disgusting, miniscule life-forms that
terrorize the body, constitution-wise, are annihilated; and the revolting emissions that
result from the remnants of excrement and perspiration are purged. The types of humans who
bathe a lot are, ergo, characterized by feelings of happiness and joy. In contrast, humans
who, in a miserly manner, declare that bathing is made cost-prohibitive by the supposedly
astronomical price of water, will be isolated from other humans, and thusly fall into the
depths of despair. One needs not an eagle eye for the appropriate conclusion to be drawn:
all human beings would be better off if they bathed with frequency. |