|

|
Tutor/Mentor Connection Map Gallery:
Poverty in the Chicago Area
(Census 2000)
|
|
|
Change in
Chicago Poverty
This map shows how the population below the poverty
level has changed from 1990 to 2000. The greens indicate that there are fewer
people below the poverty level in 2000. Blues indicate an increase in people
below the poverty level. There are two clusters of positive change, one north
of Interstate 55 and one to the south. These areas are where poverty was
greatest in 1990 as well as in 2000. Things are getting better, but there is
still much room for improvement.
|
|

|
Chicago Poverty in 2000
This map is similar to the TMC maps of
poverty in 1990. It shows the percent of the population below the poverty
level by Block Group area. In addition it shows the depth of poverty by
showing how many of those in poverty have an income less than half of the
poverty level. This additional parameter helps us focus on those areas that
have the greatest need
|
|

|
Cook Co Poverty in 2000
This map shows the extent of poverty in all
of Cook Co. It indicates that poverty is not just in the inner city. TMC maps
usually show where at least 20% of the population is below the poverty level.
By mapping those areas where the percentage is 10% and 5% we get a broader
view of where people benefit from development programs like mentoring and
tutoring.
|
|

|
Chicago Areas of Poverty and Poor Schools
At the end of 2001 the
Illinois State Board of Education release a warning list of poorly performing
schools in the state. This map shows the relationship of poverty to
poorly performing schools in the City of Chicago. The concentration of these schools is
greatest in those areas of greater poverty. Mentoring and Tutoring
programs in the area provide support activities to children that are designed
to turn this trend around.
|
|

|
Poverty in Chicago – 1990 vs.
2000
In the ten years since the last Census, much progress has
been made in identifying those areas where children are at risk and linking
them with programs that can make a difference. As can be seen from the
two maps comparing poverty in 1990 with poverty in 2000, there is still much
to be done. There is also a continuing need to sustain the efforts
already being made.
|
|

|
Poverty and Poorly Performing
Schools in NE Illinois
Much of the effort to counteract the effects of poverty on
children in the last ten years has been focused on the Chicago
area proper. As can be seen from the map of NE Illinois,
the concentration of poorly performing schools in the city illustrates why
this is a primary area of concern. As the map also shows, there are
schools at risk outside the city as well as areas of poverty. As we
build up the programs to support children in the central city, we should also
begin to look to the outlying communities and address any shortfalls in
development programs so that no child slips through the cracks.
|