Refuting Atheism by Jeffrey Stueber critiques atheist responses to the moral argument, the argument to design, the existence of consciousness and a soul, and the resurrection of Jesus. It examines their response to the existence of what I call “the religious impulse” – meaning that this desire and the prevalence of religious belief cannot be explained naturalistically. It demonstrates there is a consistent historical trend in admitting the evidence for evolution is sparse or non-existent and the most prevalent reason for accepting biological and stellar evolution is bias against the supernatural. 82 pages of fact-filled information will have your mind reeling from the mental overflow, giving you the ammunition to refute atheist arguments.
Richard Dawkins said it best:
What I am skeptical about is the idea that whatever wonderful revelation does come in the science of the future, it will turn out to be one of the particular historical religions that people happen to have dreamed up. When we [he and Collins] started out and we were talking about the origins of the universe and the physical constants, I provided what I thought were cogent arguments against a supernatural intelligent designer. But it does seem to me to be worthy idea. Refutable – but nevertheless grand and big enough to be worthy of respect. I don’t see the Olympian gods or Jesus coming down and dying on the Cross as worthy of that grandeur. They strike me as parochial. If there is a God, it’s going to be a whole lot bigger and a whole lot more incomprehensible than anything that any theologian has ever proposed.