¨
Lit. "good death" euthanasia come from
the Greek roots eu- meaning well or good and thanatos, death
¨
What counts as
a good death?
¨
One we have
control over?
¨
One sudden and
unexpected?
¨
Probably not
one long and dragged out…
¨
Active vs.
Passive euthanasia
¨
Passive
euthanasia generally refers either to the withholding or the discontinuation of
medical treatment, allowing a medical condition to cause death
¨
Active
euthanasia generally refers to the administration of a lethal drug or some
other means to cause death
¨
Also there is
physician-assisted suicide (e.g. Dr. Jack Kevorkian)
¨
Other relevant
distinctions
¨
Voluntary -
Involuntary
¨
Ordinary
measures - extraordinary measures
¨
Intended vs.
foreseen effects (e.g. the administration of pain medication when a sufficient
dose to alleviate pain will also have the effect of killing the patient)
¨
Consequentialist
considerations
¨
Individual case
vs. general rule
¨
Personal
control
¨
Others affected
¨
Nonconsequentialist
considerations
¨
Personal
autonomy
¨
Loss of
rational capacity, depression, etc. influencing decisions
¨
Active vs.
passive euthanasia
¨
Ordinary vs.
extraordinary measures
¨
Infant
euthanasia
¨
Who should
decide
¨
On what basis
¨
The argument
from nature
¨
The essential
nature and goal of humans (and all living things) is to live
¨
Euthanasia acts
contrary to that nature
¨
The argument
from self-interest
¨
Death is final
and irreversible
¨
Mistaken diagnoses
are possible
¨
Experimental
procedures might work
¨
Spontaneous
remission sometimes happens
¨
Knowing that we
can take our life might incline us to give up too easily
¨
The argument
from practical effects
¨
Euthanasia
might alter the commitment of doctors and nurses to saving lives
¨
Euthanasia is a
slippery slope - it could lead to nonvoluntary euthanasia, directed euthanasia
as a part of social policy, etc.
¨
The AMA's
position on euthanasia could lead to severe moral dilemmas for medical
personnel
¨
Perhaps, active
euthanasia is the more preferable option, if it is to be allowed at all
¨
The distinction
between active and passive euthanasia leads to life and death decisions being
made on irrelevant grounds
¨
E.g. Downs'
syndrome children allowed to die due to intestinal blockage, when such
blockages are easily treatable (and would be in any other infant)
¨
There is no
significant moral difference between killing and letting die