A Reporter's LincolnNo publisher has done more to bring back into print scarce
Lincoln books than the University of Nebraska Press. Over the
past few years Bison Books has brought forth new editions of publications
written by Francis Carpenter, Francis Fischer Browne, Isaac N.
Arnold and Ward H. Lamon. Each book contains a new introduction
by a renown scholar, and is presented in a paperback format, making
them affordable alternatives to the often high-priced original
editions.
The University of Nebraska's latest effort, a reworking of A
Reporter's Lincoln by Walter B. Stevens, goes well beyond
the scope of a simple reprint. It is really an expansion and elaboration
of the 1916 original book. To tackle the job they called upon
the prodigious author Michel Burlingame.
A Reporter's Lincoln was published in 1916. It was an assemblage
of reminiscences collected by Stevens beginning in 1886, when
he was the chief of the Washington bureau for the St. Louis
Globe-Democrat. The accumulated recollections, augmented by
materials owned by collector William K. Bixby, statements collected
by the Lincoln Centennial Association and the Historical Society
of Bloomington, Illinois, were originally published in the
Globe-Democrat's Sunday Magazine between January 3 and April
11, 1909. The series, titled "Recollections of Lincoln"
also borrowed materials from previously published reminiscences
of Lincoln. Approximately one-half of the material originally
published in the Globe-Democrat found its way into the
1916 book, A Reporter's Lincoln, now a somewhat scarce
title, being a limited edition of only 600 copies.
But the Bison Books edition goes far beyond a mere reprinting
of the original 1916 edition. Dr. Burlingame carefully edited
the text, making a large number of annotations expanding upon
and explaining various references. Burlingame then compared the
recollections appearing in the book to those that appeared in
the Globe-Democrat articles. The articles that appeared
in the newspaper but did not appear in the original book are reprinted
as "supplementary materials." The reprinted recollections
constitute 120 pages of the book, consisting of 31 separate reminiscences.
The supplementary material adds an additional 43 reminiscences
constituting another 104 pages.
Burlingame also adds three appendices to the book. The first is
a reminiscence by Mr. Benjamin S. Edwards concerning Mary Lincoln's
child rearing skills. The second appendix is a rather interesting
account of the accuracy of the newspaper versions of the Lincoln-Douglas
debates. The reminiscence of Robert R. Hitt is at the center of
the story. Hitt served as a shorthand reporter for the Chicago
Press and Tribune during the debates. Using Hitt's recollections,
Burlingame attempts to discredit Harold Holzer's presentation
of the debates in The Lincoln Douglas Debates: The First Complete
Unexpurgated Text (New York: Harper Collins, 1993). The final
appendix of A Reporter's Lincoln is a record of Lincoln's
September 30, 1863, meeting with a group of Missouri radicals.
Taken as a whole, the compilation is yet another treasure trove
of reminiscences that has been rediscovered. Recent years have
seen a new respect for the value of written reminiscences and
oral history. However, one must recognize that human nature and
faulty memories often affect the accuracy of recollections related
many years after the fact. Burlingame acknowledges this fact and
cautions his readers to use such material critically. In fact,
Dr. Burlingame points out many errors of fact throughout the book,
and chose not to include reminiscences that are known to be false
or fabricated.
Allow me this opportunity to climb upon my soapbox and offer a
word of advice to all publishers. This is in no way a criticism
of any publisher in particular, especially the University of Nebraska
Press. It is, however, an appropriate occasion to make mention
of this matter, as my frustration level was pushed to its limit
while reading A Reporter's Lincoln. I am referring to the
practice of using endnotes rather that footnotes.
Reading a book written or edited by Michael Burlingame and not
reading his notes is something akin to going to the best restaurant
in town and ordering nothing but a glass of iced tea. It may be
a great glass of tea, but you miss out on the real reason for
going there. Burlingame offers his readers a feast of information
in his annotations, and to force the scholarly reader to flip
back and forth to the endnote section of the book, often several
times per paragraph, is nothing short of a form of bibliographic
torture. How I long for the good old days of the footnote, where
I could find a reference by merely shifting my eyes rather than
rifling a book!
But don't let this criticism prevent you from obtaining a copy
of A Reporter's Lincoln. It is an excellent source of some
long-forgotten reminiscences of Lincoln, and makes a worthy addition
to any Lincoln library endnotes and all.
University of Nebraska Press
312 North 14th Street
P.O. Box 880484
Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0484
(402) 472-3581