Much of the information we have about Vlad III comes from pamphlets published in
Germany and Russia after his death. The German pamphlets appeared shortly after
Dracula's death and, at least initially, may have been politically inspired. At that time
Matthias Corvinus of Hungary was seeking to bolster his own reputation in the Holy Roman
Empire and may have intended the early pamphlets as justification of his less than
vigorous support of his vassal. The pamphlets were also a form of mass entertainment in a
society where the printing press was just coming into widespread use. Much like the
subject matter of the supermarket tabloids of today, the cruel life of the Wallachian tyrant
was easily sensationalized. The pamphlets were reprinted numerous times over the thirty
or so years following Dracula's death -- strong proof of their popularity. 
         
  The German pamphlets painted Dracula as an inhuman monster who terrorized the land
and butchered innocents with sadistic glee. The Russian pamphlets took a somewhat
different view. The princes of Moscow were at that time just beginning to build the basis of
what would become the autocracy of the czars. They were also having considerable
trouble with disloyal, often treasonous boyars. In Russia, Dracula was presented as a cruel
but just prince whose actions were directed toward the greater good of his people.
Despite the differences in interpretation the pamphlets, regardless of their land of origin,
agree remarkably well as to specifics. The level of agreement between the various
pamphlets has led most historians to conclude that at least the broad outlines of the events
covered actually occurred. 
        
  Romanian verbal tradition provides another important source for the life of Vlad Dracula.
Legends and tales concerning the Impaler have remained a part of folklore among the
Romanian peasantry. These tales have been passed down from generation to generation
for five hundred years. Through constant retelling they have become somewhat garbled
and confused and they are gradually being forgotten by the younger generations. However,
they still provide valuable information about Dracula and his relationship with his own
people. Many of the tales contained in the pamphlets are also found in the verbal tradition,
though with a somewhat different emphasis. Among the Romanian peasantry Dracula is
remembered as a just prince who defended his people from foreigners, whether those
foreigners be Turkish invaders or German merchants. He is also remembered as
somewhat of a champion of the common man against the oppression of the boyars.
Dracula's fierce insistence on honesty is a central part of the verbal tradition. Many of the
anecdotes contained in the pamphlets and in the verbal tradition demonstrate the prince's
efforts to eliminate crime and dishonesty from his domain. However, despite the more
positive interpretation, the Romanian verbal tradition also remembers Dracula as an
exceptionally cruel and often capricious ruler. 
      
  There are several events that are common to all the pamphlets, regardless of their
nation of origin. Many of these events are also found in the Romanian verbal tradition.
Specific details may vary among the different versions of these anecdotes but the general
course of events usually agrees to a remarkable extent. For example, in some versions the
foreign ambassadors received by Dracula at Tirgoviste are Florentine, in others they are
Turkish. The nature of their offense against the Prince also varies from version to version.
However, all versions agree that Dracula, in response to some real or imagined insult, had
their hats nailed to their heads. Some of the sources view Dracula's actions as justified,
others view his acts as crimes of wanton and senseless cruelty. There are about nine
anecdotes that are almost universal in the Dracula literature. 

Atrocities 9 Anecdotes