| |
ORIGIN: Unknown
MIGRATION: 1630
FIRST RESIDENCE: Dorchester
REMOVES: Windsor 1635
FREEMANSHIP: Requested 18 October 1630 [MBCR 1:79].
EDUCATION: His inventory included books valued at 10s.
Ann Hoskins made her mark to her will.
OFFICES: Jury "for the trial of Walter Palmer, concerning
the death of Austin Bratcher," 9 November 1630 [MBCR
1:81]. Dorchester fence~viewer, 24 May 1634 [DTR 6].
ESTATE: On 3 April 1633 "John Hoskeins" was assigned the
erecting of sixty feet of rails in the common fence for his
three cows (also "Goodman Hoskeins" [DTR
2, 3]. On 2 June 1634 "John Hoskeins seinor" was granted four
acres of meadow "in the neck where the dog was killed" [DTR
6] which he presumably sold in or about 1635, upon his departure
for Windsor.
In the Windsor land inventory on 16 November 1640 "John
Hoskins the father and Tho[mas]
Hoskins the son have granted from the
plantation an homelot with the additions whereon the dwelling
house stands eighteen acres," seventeen acres in the Meade,
"over the Great River next the said river in breadth eighteen
rods in length, to the east three miles," "towards Pine Meadow
twenty-seven acres" and "in the Pine Meade fourteen acres"; this
entry was followed by later instructions on the divisions of
these parcels between the father and the son [WiLR 1:4].
In his will, dated 1 May 1648 and proved on an unknown date,
"John Horskins" bequeathed to "the Church £3 to be distributed
by the deacons unto the poor"; to "my servant Sammuel Rockwell
if he be willing to serve in my house one quarter of a year
after his covenant is out which he hath formerly made, my will
is that at the end of his service he shall have £6 of me; if not
willing, then he shall receive £4 at the completion of his term
of service already covenanted"; list of debtors; to "my wife and
son Thomas" residue [
CCCR 1:483-84;
Manwaring 1:18].
The inventory of John Hoskins was
taken 29 June 1648 and totalled £338 6s. 8d., including £161
15s. in real estate: "the house and two barns, with the homelot
of 12 acres of land," £52; "21 acres of meadow," £42; "a great
lot, 27 acres," £6 15s.; "at Pyne Meadow, 14 acres," £30; and "a
parcel of swamp, 3 acres," £3 [CCCR
1:484-85;
Manwaring 1:18].
In her will, dated 17 August 1660 and proved on an unknown
date, "Ane Hoskins, widow, wife of John
Hoskins of Windsor," bequeathed to "my
son Thomas Hoskins ... my part of the
housing & land which was half of all that was my husband's ... &
after his decease I give it to his son John
Hoskins"; if John die before "he come to his age to
possess & enjoy this estate, then my will is that this whole
estate that was mine shall be distributed equally amongst the
children of my daughter Wilton's daughter Mary Marshall"; a
featherbed and furniture to "my son Thomas
Hoskins & after his decease I give it to his son John
Hoskins all to be kept for him till the
age of one and twenty years and in case he die before that age,
then this as the housing & land shall be to Mary Marshall's
children"; household goods to "my son Thomas" and after him to
"his son John"; "my wearing apparel" to "my daughter Wilton";
"for my overseers I desire John Strong Sr. & my son David
Wilton" [
Hartford PD Case
#2880].
The inventory of the estate of Ann Hoskins,
taken 1 June 1663, totalled £113 4s., of which £102 10s. was
real estate: "half the housing, half the orchard and half the
homelot," £45; "her half of meadow in the great meadow six
acres," £30; "her half in pine meadow seven acres," £21; and
"her half in a woodlot thirteen acres," £6 10s. [Hartford
PD Case #2880].
BIRTH: By about 1588 based on estimated date of marriage.
DEATH: Windsor between 1 May 1648 (date of will) and 29
June 1648 (date of inventory) [Grant 80].
MARRIAGE: By about 1613 Ann _____ (assuming she was
mother of all three of the children listed below). The language
of the wills of John Hoskins and Ann
Hoskins and the bunching of the
estimated ages of the three possible children suggest that both
Ann and John may have been married previously. "Old widow
Hoskins" died at Windsor 6 March
1662[/3] [CTVR 21; Grant 83].
CHILDREN:
| |
i (prob.)
JOHN, b. by about 1613; a John Hoskins
is admitted to freemanship on 14 May 1634 [MBCR
1:369], and twice in 1634 there are references to "John
Hoskins Sr." [DTR
6], which implies the presence of a younger adult of the
same name in Dorchester; there is no further record of this
man, and no certainty that he was son of John Sr. |
| |
ii THOMAS, b. by about 1614; freeman 6 May 1635 [MBCR
1:370]; m. Windsor 20 April 1653 "Elisabeth Birg widow" [CTVR
41; Grant
61], widow of Richard Birge and daughter of
WILLIAM GAYLORD. |
| |
iii (poss.) KATHERINE, b. say 1615; m. (1) by about
1634
DAVID WILTON; m. (2) Hartford 6 May 1679 Thomas Hosmer [TAG 38:6]. |
COMMENTS: Given his presence at Dorchester in 1630 and
his likely West Country origin, Hoskins
presumably sailed on the Mary & John. Several sources state that
Hoskins came from Beaminster, Dorset,
but this remains only a suggestion. There were
Hoskins families in Beaminster, and David Wilton, who
married Hoskins's daughter (or
stepdaughter) was from Beaminster, but as yet no solid evidence
for this origin has been discovered [NEHGR
143:117-19].
Older sources claim that John Hoskins's
wife was Ann Filer sister of Walter Filer, and that there were
two more children: Anthony
Hoskins, who married in 1656, and
Rebecca, who also married in 1656. There is, however, no
evidence for the identity of Hoskins's
wife, and Anthony and Rebecca are more
likely his nephew and niece, or even totally unrelated.
Genevieve Kiepura presented the arguments for excluding
Anthony and Rebecca [TAG
30:191-92], and her conclusions were supported by Coddington a
few years later [TAG
38:1-4].
Thomas and Katherine were clearly both children of Ann
(_____) Hoskins, but it is not clear
whether Katherine was daughter of John Hoskins;
and these two children and the probable John were all born in
the second decade of the seventeenth century, while
Anthony and Rebecca would have been
nearly a generation younger. See also the more recent work of
Gerald J. Parsons [NEHGR
143:117-19], which is in agreement with Kiepura and Coddington
on these points.
On 30 November 1630 "Bartholomewe Hill is adjudged to be
whipped for stealing a loaf of bread from John
Hoskins, which himself confesseth" [MBCR
1:82].
|