Beneath the Stripes:

Tourette's Syndrome from the Tiger’s View

by Darin M. Bush

 

"Excellent, Well. You are a Touretter."

 

Hamlet said these words to Polonius in Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”. Okay, I admit: I changed ‘fish-monger’ to ‘Touretter’. Hamlet, conspiring with his father’s ghost to avenge his death, is faking having TS/ ADHD/ OCD. Yes, I am reaching, but watch one of the several movie adaptations of Hamlet, and keep me in mind. Spooky, huh? Do I have a point that is not tipped in poison? Have I let you down yet? In the grand tradition of Shakespeare, I would like to analyze some important TS terms, correcting one and supporting the other.

Shakespeare was, of course, a grand master of English, and relied on it to entertain and provoke emotion. The TS community must also rely on language to persuade & educate. We must come to a consensus on how we talk about TS. George Carlin, another English master, said, “The quality of our thoughts is only as good as the quality of our language.” Right now, as I see it, our quality is lacking. Want an example? Here is an easy one: what is the name of our disorder? Is it Tourette Syndrome? Tourettes Syndrome? Tourettes Yndrome?

The correct term is ‘Tourette’s syndrome’. I know that very competent TS professionals have published work listing this disorder’s name differently. However, grammar is the deciding discipline, not neurology or psychology. Heck, psychology can not even spell itself correctly; what is with the ‘p’? Now that is settled, let us look at TS through grammar’s lens. Tourette’s syndrome is an eponymous possessive, also known as a synthetic genitive. An eponym is a name from a name, e.g.: Hadrian’s wall. The term consists of two words that stand together. The rule for capitalization is: No Extra Capitals. Oops, sorry about that. Just as you do not capitalize cancer, wall, or syndrome by themselves, you do not capitalize them in an eponymous possessive. Also, since it is a possessive, it needs an apostrophe. Therefore, the term is properly spelled ‘Tourette’s syndrome’.

While Shakespeare would approve the use of grammar to settle a debate, he would also agree that sometimes a new word is required. The Bard himself is credited with inventing over 300 words. One of my other personas, The Wordsmith, has invented a few words only to discover they already existed. While I can not take credit for the word ‘Touretter’, I would like to support its use. Yes, it is slang, but how many times do you have to say, “Person with Tourette’s syndrome” before they call him a Touretter? (Thanks to Joan Baez for accompaniment on the guitar.) By coincidence, the word rolls off the tongue. I like it.

Some people want to fight the word. I say, fight the bigotry against Touretters. Take the word in context, and remember to use your sense of humor to take the edge off of, well, everything. I leave by example; please do not refer to me as a Touretter. In the future, please refer to me as a ‘stillness-challenged’ individual. Just like Hamlet.

 

Questions? Suggestions? Arguments? Call me names at the Tourette Tiger

Copyright 2005 by Darin M. Bush

 

Back to Article Index