The WordSmith

by Darin M. Bush


Attack of the Initials

Please note, The Wordsmith does not claim 100% accuracy.  When I make a mistake, or if you disagree, please email me.  Keep in mind, English grammar is a living creature and sometimes the rules change.  Also remember if you follow the rule correctly, it does not matter how you get there.  Sometimes a mnemonic (memory trick) works for no one but you.  Who cares?  For example, before I buy soda I look at my paycheck.

So the important part is not getting the why explained exactly, but making the correct decision.  Take for example, for example.  (Checked that last sentence twice, and it is correct.  Sorry.)  We use examples so much and elaborate so often, a couple of short hand notations were invented to make things “easier”.  I am referring to i.e. and e.g.  They mean, respectively, “such as” and “in example”.

I said earlier remembering is more important than the way you remember.  It applies here beautifully.  If you were really careful, you might have noticed i.e. does NOT mean “in example”.  Huh?  E.g. actually is the abbreviation for the Latin meaning “in example”.  I.e. is the abbreviation for the Latin meaning “such as” (or close enough).  The key here is the terms are not English, but Latin.  So the words “in example” are not even possible choices.

Let me give you a mnemonic for this initial problem with initials, i.e.: let me sum up.  The way I decide whether to use e.g. or i.e. is to remember the meanings are “backwards” if they are English abbreviations!  There are some flaws in this reasoning, e.g.: what does e.g. stand for in English?  However, even with the flawed logic, I am still able to use the two terms correctly, and that is really the point, i.e.: the bottom line.

 

Questions? Suggestions? Please send examples to the Tourette Tiger

Copyright 2003-2005 by Darin M. Bush


 

Back to Article Index