WIMHOA Main1
WIMHOA Main2

 

Who We Are

WIMHOA is a nonprofit, statewide, consumer organization (tenants' union validated by Statute 704) not associated in any way with the industry (park owners, community managers, dealers or manufacturers). At least 250,000 consumers live in manufactured housing in this state.

Members of an incorporated entity (i.e., WIMHOA) have no personal liability, such as in a class action lawsuit.  We exist under the aegis of Wisconsin Administrative Code 134.09(5)(b), prohibiting retaliatory eviction for joining or attempting to organize a tenants' association.  The U.S. Constitution also validates our right to belong to or form a union.

We publish a quarterly newsletter, the WIMHOA Vanguard.   We invite news submissions to our PO Box address or by email, but we reserve the right to edit all submissions for clarity, space, et al.  Contact us if you would like a copy.   

See our Forms or Contact pages (top left Main Menu) to become involved and/or support the goal of helping more mfd. homeowners convert to Resident-Owned Communities.  Also see www.ROCUSA.org. to learn more.

Our membership list is confidential and is never sold.  All persons living in mfd. housing within Wisconsin are eligible for membership on an equal basis--except management (owners) and its employees. Our By-laws allow former tenants to remain members of WIMHOA if they wish.

OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBERS
Kristen Zehner, State President
JoAn Haackbarth, V-P & Evergreen Village Coordinator
James C. Williams, Treasurer
(open)  Secretary
Donna Bosch, At-Large Board Members
Nancy Huggins, At-Large Board Member

Eleanor Shakstad, Organizer

 

Breaking News
COMING SOON:  The ability to join WIMHOA online.   See Contact or Forms in the drop-down WIMHOA Main Menu at the top left of this page soon.

 

NOTIFICATION OF MHP CLOSINGS and/or RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL

 Wisconsin has NO Law Protecting Your MHP Homes to Date (2007).  This is a national trend across the USA, and to date MHP homeowners in most states have receive NO compensation for their losses.  Park owners are selling land for redevelopment with no consideration of your losses.  Take this language to your local public officials for incorporation into Local Ordinances ASAP!  Then lobby your State Legislator to address this ASAP.

SOURCES:  National Consumer Law Center / AARP/ NeighborWorks/ ROCUSA

1.        What constitutes an effective ordinance (Law)?

          A.          Universal Notice (automatic for change of use)

                    1.  Not just resident association

                    2.  Not just when owner offers for sale

                    3.  No hurdles to overcome

          B.          Delay period

          C.          Right of first refusal

                    1.  Alternative:  Negotiate in good faith

          D.          Duty to provide information (price, terms, conditions)

  II.          Alternatives to Right of First Refusal

          A.          Notice-only at least one year in advance, plus notifcation to a

                    public agency of intent to sell; i.e., simultaneous dual notice;

          B.          Tax incentive;

          C.          Resident compensation;

          D.          Condition on zoning change, or

          E.          Government Funding

 III.          Exemptions to Notification

          A.          Any mortgagee foreclosure on an MHP;

          B.          Any sale/transfer to a family member of owner or to a trust whose

                    beneficiaries are family members of owner;

          C.          Sale or transfer by a partnership to one or more partners;

          D.          Conveyance of interest in an MHP incidental to financing of MHP;

          E.          Sale/transfer between joint tenants or tenants in common;

          F.          Sale pursuant to eminent domain.

 IV.          Measureable enforcement and penalties for noncompliance

          A.          Dual notification in timely manner, whether in midst of an illegal

                    sale, before, or after it;

          B.          Penalty of $10,000 or 10% of sale price, which is greater,

                    for failure to do dual notification, unless exempted as above.

 V.       Other states (13) with MHP Closing Notice or Rt. of First Refusal

          (California, Florida, Connecticut, Main, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey,

          Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington [Rt of First Refusal declared

                    unconstitutional)

          A.          Massachusetts

                    1.          Notice and right of first refusal

                    2.          Notice to each tenant w/copies to public officials

                    3.          Notice required before any sale or lease that would result

                              in change of use

                    4.          Notice also required before any sale if residents have given

                              owner notice.

           B.          Vermont

                    1.          Notice and duty to negotiate in good faith

                    2.          Notice to each resident and to state official

                    3.          Notice required whenever owner intends to sell the MHP

                    4.          Also provides tax incentive

           C.          New Hampshire

                    1.          Notice but no right of first refusal--instead, owner has duty to

                              consider residents' offer in good faith with them

                    2.          Universal notice--to each resident and before any sale

                              (exceptions for foreclosure, sale to family members, etc.)

 

 

Site Updated:   June  2007

 

This site has been tested in Mozilla, Opera, Netscape, and Internet Explorer. © Copyright 2003-2004